regrep-cc-review

← back

142 messages · 72 threads

Thread Messages Started
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations 1 2003-08-01
CCTS Spec RIM Mappings - [S35] to [S43] 1 2003-08-01
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Cardinality Out Of Our Scope? )Was Re: FW: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations) 1 2003-08-04
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations 2 2003-08-04
Re: CCTS Spec RIM Mappings - [S31] to [S34] 1 2003-08-04
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Cardinality Out Of Our Scope? )Was Re: FW: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations) 1 2003-08-04
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations 3 2003-08-04
[Fwd: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)] 1 2003-08-04
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent with Associations 2 2003-08-05
No Subject 2 2003-08-05
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations 2 2003-08-05
Updated Requirements Mapping Document - Please Review 2 2003-08-05
Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components 3 2003-08-05
[Fwd: FW: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation ofAggregate Core Components] 2 2003-08-05
[Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components] 2 2003-08-05
RE: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components] 8 2003-08-05
[Fwd: [cam] Core Components Issue: Representation of AggregateCore Components] 2 2003-08-05
Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representationof Aggregate Core Components] 1 2003-08-05
Use Cases: CCTS P.12 Example 2 2003-08-05
Slots - Current Thinking 1 2003-08-07
[Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components] 1 2003-08-07
ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-07
Potential Version 2.6 Modification - Versions on RegistryObjects (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-07
Re: Potential Version 2.6 Modification - Versions on RegistryObjects(Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 2 2003-08-07
Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-07
Expression Type (Was Re: CCTS Spec RIM Mappings - [S31] to [S34]) 1 2003-08-07
New Requirements Mapping - Up To [S34] (inclusive) 1 2003-08-07
Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 2 2003-08-07
Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-08
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core 1 2003-08-08
Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-08
Bringing It Home: BIEs, ASCCs, and Business Context 2 2003-08-08
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Bringing It Home: BIEs, ASCCs, and BusinessContext 2 2003-08-09
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review]Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-10
A Slight Adjustment (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Bringing It Home: BIEs, ASCCs, and Business Context) 1 2003-08-11
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 1 2003-08-11
New Requirements Mapping - Up To [S43] (inclusive) 1 2003-08-11
Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] A Slight Adjustment (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Bringing It Home: BIEs, ASCCs, and Business Context)] 1 2003-08-11
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 2 2003-08-11
Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: ACC or ABIE? (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Association Core Components - Represent withAssociations) 2 2003-08-11
[Fwd: [regrep] Core Components Walkthrough - 8/21/03] 1 2003-08-11
"Our" Requirements 2 2003-08-11
Our Requirements - Updated Version 1 2003-08-13
[Fwd: *Potential* ebXML Registry Implementation] 2 2003-08-14
CCTS Spec RIM Mappings - [S44] to [S52] 1 2003-08-14
CCTS Section 7.5 - Core Component Storage Metadata 1 2003-08-14
(Final Set!) CCTS Spec RIM Mappings - [S53] to [S64] 1 2003-08-15
CC Review Technical Note: Help Wanted! 2 2003-08-15
UBL Review of CCTS: Use of Qualifiers for Object Class Terms and Property Terms 1 2003-08-18
Re: [regrep-cc-review] UBL Review of CCTS: Use of Qualifiers forObject Class Terms and Property Terms 2 2003-08-18
Re: [ubl-lcsc] UBL Result Paper of CC Implementation Verification 1 2003-08-18
Re: [regrep] [PRELIMINARY INFORMATION] Re: [regrep] Core ComponentsWalkthrough - 8/21/03 1 2003-08-20
Meeting reminder and agenda for Registry TC call today 1 2003-08-21
Issues from Registry TC 8/21 Review 1 2003-08-22
Issue #1: Unique Identifiers 10 2003-08-22
Issue #2: "Joining" ACCs 3 2003-08-22
Conformance to CCTS 3 2003-08-24
Issue #3: P.12 Example in the Registy 6 2003-08-24
Issue #4: 11179 Data Element Terms 10 2003-08-24
Issue #5: Storage of Properties 1 2003-08-24
Association Core Component - Needs a New Name 3 2003-08-25
[regrep-cc-review] Issue #4: 11179 Data Element Terms - Fred, needCCSD Primer! 1 2003-08-25
Issue #6: Content Components (Final Issue) 1 2003-08-25
Re: [ebxml-dev] ebXML tutorial, implementations in Scandinavia 2 2003-08-25
RE: [regrep-cc-review] Property Qualifier 2 2003-08-27
Properties (Was Re: [regrep-cc-review] Issue #4: 11179 Data Element Terms) 2 2003-08-27
Conformance to CCTS Spec: Legal Aspects 2 2003-08-27
Registry TC Review of Our Work 1 2003-08-27
RE: [regrep-cc-review] New CCTS finalized 7 2003-08-27
New Article: "UDDI and ebXML Registries: Three-Tier Vision" 1 2003-08-27
Feedback Due 9/5: Updated Requirements Mapping 1 2003-08-27
Continued Registry TC Review of Core Components Work 2 2003-08-28