| 00005 |
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
|
2003-01-31 22:17 |
| 00012 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-01 04:42 |
| 00013 |
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-01 05:06 |
| 00006 |
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-01 05:12 |
| 00004 |
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-01 05:27 |
| 00007 |
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-01 05:32 |
| 00003 |
[xml-dev] HRXML |
vijay
|
2003-02-01 06:29 |
| 00008 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life |
Andy Greener
|
2003-02-01 09:41 |
| 00001 |
Re: The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-01 10:07 |
| 00002 |
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-01 14:03 |
| 00000 |
Re: [xml-dev] The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-01 14:58 |
| 00009 |
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-01 15:50 |
| 00010 |
[xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-01 16:58 |
| 00011 |
RE: [xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-01 17:18 |
| 00066 |
Re: [xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-01 17:29 |
| 00037 |
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-01 17:32 |
| 00022 |
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-01 17:36 |
| 00080 |
RE: [xml-dev] The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-01 18:06 |
| 00023 |
Re: [xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-01 21:31 |
| 00036 |
Error Detection for XML? |
Rakesh Mathur
|
2003-02-02 00:10 |
| 00081 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 15:10 |
| 00053 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: The patron saints of XML WAS: Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 15:45 |
| 00041 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 15:58 |
| 00064 |
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-02 16:04 |
| 00110 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 16:09 |
| 00079 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-02 16:17 |
| 00068 |
SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-02 16:19 |
| 00101 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-02 16:38 |
| 00109 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-02 16:42 |
| 00039 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 16:50 |
| 00100 |
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-02 16:55 |
| 00054 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-02 16:59 |
| 00043 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-02 17:16 |
| 00038 |
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-02 17:22 |
| 00056 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 17:30 |
| 00052 |
Re: [xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Mitch Amiano
|
2003-02-02 17:33 |
| 00111 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life |
Bart Schuller
|
2003-02-02 19:05 |
| 00040 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 19:39 |
| 00099 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Joe English
|
2003-02-02 19:42 |
| 00098 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-02 19:44 |
| 00112 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-02 19:50 |
| 00055 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-02 20:09 |
| 00051 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-02 21:26 |
| 00077 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-02 21:31 |
| 00042 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-02 21:34 |
| 00069 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-02 22:18 |
| 00024 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-03 00:05 |
| 00035 |
Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Michael Leditschke
|
2003-02-03 00:17 |
| 00034 |
RE: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-03 00:23 |
| 00025 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-03 00:49 |
| 00067 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-03 01:49 |
| 00078 |
RE: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Michael Leditschke
|
2003-02-03 02:08 |
| 00065 |
poisoned markup |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-03 02:20 |
| 00082 |
Re: [xml-dev] poisoned markup |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-03 02:32 |
| 00106 |
Re: [xml-dev] poisoned markup |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-03 02:36 |
| 00092 |
Re: [xml-dev] poisoned markup |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-03 02:40 |
| 00044 |
Re: [xml-dev] poisoned markup |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-03 02:42 |
| 00062 |
Re: [xml-dev] poisoned markup |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-03 03:26 |
| 00061 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-03 07:04 |
| 00046 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-03 07:59 |
| 00090 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-03 08:33 |
| 00107 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-03 11:53 |
| 00095 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-03 13:30 |
| 00105 |
UDDI Spec TC committee spec public review |
Karl Best
|
2003-02-03 13:42 |
| 00019 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-03 14:01 |
| 00028 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-03 14:05 |
| 00084 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-03 14:14 |
| 00076 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-03 14:23 |
| 00074 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-03 14:30 |
| 00085 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-03 14:35 |
| 00021 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-03 14:55 |
| 00027 |
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-03 14:55 |
| 00029 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-03 15:05 |
| 00016 |
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-03 15:37 |
| 00096 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser? |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-03 15:39 |
| 00033 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-03 15:55 |
| 00014 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Editors supporting change tracking (redlining etc.) |
Robin LaFontaine
|
2003-02-03 15:58 |
| 00072 |
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-03 16:13 |
| 00087 |
ANN: Examplotron 0.7 |
Eric van der Vlist
|
2003-02-03 16:20 |
| 00088 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-03 17:21 |
| 00071 |
Re: [xml-dev] Usefulness of well-formedness |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-03 18:03 |
| 00018 |
SVG OPEN 2003 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION |
Philip Mansfield
|
2003-02-03 18:34 |
| 00030 |
Resources Redeemed |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-03 21:54 |
| 00020 |
XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser? |
Jenny Wong
|
2003-02-03 22:29 |
| 00026 |
Re: [xml-dev] Resources Redeemed |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-03 22:38 |
| 00103 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser? |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-04 01:35 |
| 00060 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser? |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-04 02:18 |
| 00047 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser? |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-04 03:00 |
| 00050 |
Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-04 06:34 |
| 00057 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services) |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-04 08:24 |
| 00094 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-04 12:59 |
| 00108 |
RE: [xml-dev] Resources Redeemed |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-04 14:30 |
| 00091 |
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 14:31 |
| 00049 |
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-04 14:36 |
| 00104 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
James Fuller
|
2003-02-04 14:40 |
| 00058 |
Re: [xml-dev] rules for XML? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 14:44 |
| 00093 |
misunderstanding of XML Schema ? |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-04 14:49 |
| 00097 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-04 15:02 |
| 00102 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-04 15:09 |
| 00059 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-04 15:13 |
| 00048 |
Re: [xml-dev] misunderstanding of XML Schema ? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 15:17 |
| 00063 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-04 15:19 |
| 00045 |
RE: [xml-dev] misunderstanding of XML Schema ? |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-04 15:22 |
| 00089 |
XPath position in XSLT |
Schaik, L.B. van
|
2003-02-04 15:30 |
| 00070 |
Re: [xml-dev] misunderstanding of XML Schema ? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 15:33 |
| 00017 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-04 15:34 |
| 00031 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-04 15:40 |
| 00015 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Joe English
|
2003-02-04 16:08 |
| 00073 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-04 16:10 |
| 00032 |
Re: [xml-dev] XPath position in XSLT |
m batsis
|
2003-02-04 16:13 |
| 00075 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-04 16:35 |
| 00121 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-04 16:44 |
| 00086 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-04 17:27 |
| 00083 |
Faster Web Services |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 18:28 |
| 00165 |
GZIP is an HTTP standard |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-04 18:34 |
| 00179 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-04 18:38 |
| 00136 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-04 18:44 |
| 00122 |
WAP/WML/WBXML |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-04 21:29 |
| 00135 |
Re: [xml-dev] misunderstanding of XML Schema ? |
Nada Reinprecht
|
2003-02-04 22:21 |
| 00180 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-05 03:21 |
| 00163 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-05 03:26 |
| 00178 |
SML: Second Try |
Don Park
|
2003-02-05 03:36 |
| 00167 |
Fwd: web service article |
Camille Jacks
|
2003-02-05 03:38 |
| 00209 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-05 04:38 |
| 00152 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-05 04:51 |
| 00140 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-05 05:45 |
| 00200 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-05 06:15 |
| 00210 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alessandro Triglia
|
2003-02-05 07:46 |
| 00199 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-05 09:54 |
| 00142 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Don Park
|
2003-02-05 11:07 |
| 00151 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Don Park
|
2003-02-05 11:17 |
| 00138 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
James Governor
|
2003-02-05 11:54 |
| 00153 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-05 12:15 |
| 00137 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-05 12:25 |
| 00155 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
James Governor
|
2003-02-05 12:55 |
| 00211 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-05 13:54 |
| 00198 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-05 14:07 |
| 00212 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-05 14:11 |
| 00197 |
ANNOUNCE: Syntext Dtd2Xs - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML Schema Converter |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-05 14:13 |
| 00154 |
ANNOUNCE: Syntext XslGen - XSLT/XML Aid for Web Site Content Management |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-05 14:16 |
| 00139 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-05 14:21 |
| 00150 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-05 14:28 |
| 00141 |
RE: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-05 14:34 |
| 00176 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-05 15:01 |
| 00168 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-05 16:31 |
| 00123 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-05 16:36 |
| 00134 |
web services stack |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-05 16:38 |
| 00133 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-05 16:57 |
| 00124 |
Re: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-05 17:04 |
| 00166 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-05 17:09 |
| 00177 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Paul Brown
|
2003-02-05 17:19 |
| 00164 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-05 17:21 |
| 00181 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-05 17:35 |
| 00206 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
James Governor
|
2003-02-05 18:33 |
| 00191 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-05 18:52 |
| 00143 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-05 19:16 |
| 00161 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-05 19:45 |
| 00160 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-05 20:11 |
| 00145 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-05 20:16 |
| 00189 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Don Park
|
2003-02-05 20:47 |
| 00207 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-05 21:07 |
| 00194 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Don Park
|
2003-02-05 21:42 |
| 00205 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parser (angry - don't read!) |
Niels Peter Strandberg
|
2003-02-05 22:40 |
| 00118 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML parser (angry - don't read!) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-05 22:56 |
| 00127 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML parser (angry - don't read!) |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-05 23:20 |
| 00183 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-06 07:25 |
| 00175 |
Urgent !! |
Kiran Nadgir
|
2003-02-06 08:45 |
| 00173 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Charles White
|
2003-02-06 09:05 |
| 00184 |
Urgent !! |
Kiran Nadgir
|
2003-02-06 09:54 |
| 00126 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-06 10:00 |
| 00208 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-06 11:58 |
| 00128 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-06 12:41 |
| 00120 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-06 13:22 |
| 00388 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Kiran Nadgir
|
2003-02-06 13:32 |
| 00115 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-06 16:08 |
| 00186 |
XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-06 16:10 |
| 00132 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-06 16:15 |
| 00113 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 16:15 |
| 00171 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-06 16:16 |
| 00187 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data |
James Governor
|
2003-02-06 16:32 |
| 00170 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-06 16:49 |
| 00117 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-06 17:04 |
| 00129 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-06 17:07 |
| 00119 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Joe English
|
2003-02-06 17:42 |
| 00125 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-06 18:08 |
| 00195 |
SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-06 18:12 |
| 00202 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-06 18:21 |
| 00159 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-06 19:16 |
| 00146 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-06 19:22 |
| 00149 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 19:22 |
| 00156 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Dave Pawson
|
2003-02-06 19:41 |
| 00203 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 19:43 |
| 00193 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-06 19:50 |
| 00190 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-06 20:00 |
| 00148 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Wayne Steele
|
2003-02-06 20:21 |
| 00157 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 20:25 |
| 00196 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-06 20:29 |
| 00204 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Dave Pawson
|
2003-02-06 20:43 |
| 00192 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-06 20:59 |
| 00201 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 21:12 |
| 00158 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-06 21:55 |
| 00147 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-06 22:05 |
| 00162 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-06 22:06 |
| 00144 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-06 22:12 |
| 00169 |
RE: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Alessandro Triglia
|
2003-02-06 22:12 |
| 00188 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Joe English
|
2003-02-06 22:16 |
| 00116 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-06 22:20 |
| 00130 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-06 22:23 |
| 00131 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-06 22:26 |
| 00114 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-06 22:29 |
| 00172 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Joe English
|
2003-02-06 22:30 |
| 00185 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-06 22:44 |
| 00174 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric Snell
|
2003-02-06 23:04 |
| 00182 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-07 00:42 |
| 00263 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-07 00:53 |
| 00277 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Don Park
|
2003-02-07 01:18 |
| 00221 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-07 09:24 |
| 00234 |
GML->SGML->XML->?->?->?->?->?->?->... |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-07 09:29 |
| 00278 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-07 09:59 |
| 00276 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-07 10:28 |
| 00261 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-07 10:51 |
| 00265 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-07 10:56 |
| 00250 |
Re: [xml-dev] Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-07 11:27 |
| 00238 |
Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris |
Jason Brown
|
2003-02-07 11:29 |
| 00298 |
ANN: RELAX NG to Compact Syntax Presentation in HTML (and XSLT Processor Implementer Challenge) |
David Rosenborg
|
2003-02-07 14:04 |
| 00307 |
KAVI |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 14:11 |
| 00308 |
RE: [xml-dev] GML->SGML->XML->?->?->?->?->?->?->... |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 14:16 |
| 00297 |
RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 14:25 |
| 00240 |
Re: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-07 14:26 |
| 00249 |
RE: [xml-dev] Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-07 14:30 |
| 00236 |
RE: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 14:33 |
| 00251 |
Re: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-07 14:41 |
| 00235 |
RE: [xml-dev] Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solari s |
Jason Brown
|
2003-02-07 14:50 |
| 00253 |
parameter-entity references |
Marko Milicevic
|
2003-02-07 15:10 |
| 00309 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-07 16:00 |
| 00296 |
RE: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Alessandro Triglia
|
2003-02-07 16:53 |
| 00295 |
Re: [xml-dev] parameter-entity references |
Eric Johnson
|
2003-02-07 17:22 |
| 00310 |
RE: [xml-dev] parameter-entity references |
Marko Milicevic
|
2003-02-07 17:28 |
| 00252 |
RE: [xml-dev] parameter-entity references |
Marko Milicevic
|
2003-02-07 19:05 |
| 00237 |
Transformation versus Translation |
Bent Rasmussen
|
2003-02-07 19:25 |
| 00248 |
RE: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 19:39 |
| 00239 |
RE: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Karl Best
|
2003-02-07 21:07 |
| 00274 |
Re: [xml-dev] parameter-entity references |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-07 21:42 |
| 00266 |
RE: [xml-dev] KAVI |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-07 22:11 |
| 00222 |
Re: [xml-dev] Urgent !! |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-07 22:15 |
| 00233 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Ian Graham
|
2003-02-08 01:35 |
| 00232 |
Different kind of Editor |
Bawcom, Aaron
|
2003-02-08 04:06 |
| 00223 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-08 05:42 |
| 00264 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
S Woodside
|
2003-02-08 07:15 |
| 00275 |
xml/xsl to HTML |
James Rayner
|
2003-02-08 08:09 |
| 00262 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Bart Schuller
|
2003-02-08 11:51 |
| 00279 |
RE: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Bawcom, Aaron
|
2003-02-08 21:26 |
| 00304 |
RE: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Bawcom, Aaron
|
2003-02-08 21:28 |
| 00289 |
RE: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-08 21:30 |
| 00241 |
RE: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Bawcom, Aaron
|
2003-02-08 21:55 |
| 00259 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-09 00:02 |
| 00258 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Bill Humphries
|
2003-02-09 00:34 |
| 00243 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-09 00:56 |
| 00287 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-09 01:56 |
| 00305 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-09 02:41 |
| 00292 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
S Woodside
|
2003-02-09 03:17 |
| 00303 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-09 03:23 |
| 00218 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Miles Sabin
|
2003-02-09 10:00 |
| 00226 |
headers (was ERH on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-09 14:55 |
| 00281 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Don Box
|
2003-02-09 18:23 |
| 00273 |
RE: [xml-dev] headers (was ERH on Web Services |
Don Box
|
2003-02-09 18:31 |
| 00271 |
RE: [xml-dev] headers (was ERH on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-09 19:01 |
| 00282 |
RE: [xml-dev] headers (was ERH on Web Services |
Don Box
|
2003-02-09 20:09 |
| 00225 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-09 21:01 |
| 00220 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-09 22:18 |
| 00227 |
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Don Box
|
2003-02-10 00:22 |
| 00215 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 01:32 |
| 00231 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-10 06:18 |
| 00213 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 07:08 |
| 00269 |
Re: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 07:21 |
| 00284 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-10 07:40 |
| 00285 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 08:10 |
| 00268 |
convert my relational database to XML |
madhur jain
|
2003-02-10 09:45 |
| 00217 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Dave
|
2003-02-10 10:13 |
| 00228 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 10:45 |
| 00219 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-10 10:58 |
| 00224 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
David Carlisle
|
2003-02-10 12:35 |
| 00293 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 13:52 |
| 00300 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-10 13:59 |
| 00257 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-10 14:06 |
| 00244 |
Microsoft XMLReader |
Marcin Rosłoński
|
2003-02-10 14:14 |
| 00247 |
Re: [xml-dev] convert my relational database to XML |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-10 14:14 |
| 00254 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 14:16 |
| 00301 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 14:20 |
| 00306 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 14:22 |
| 00291 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-10 14:22 |
| 00288 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 14:33 |
| 00246 |
Re: [xml-dev] convert my relational database to XML |
akmal @ city
|
2003-02-10 15:01 |
| 00255 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-10 15:01 |
| 00302 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 15:09 |
| 00290 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-10 15:10 |
| 00294 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
bryan
|
2003-02-10 15:11 |
| 00299 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-10 15:14 |
| 00256 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 15:20 |
| 00245 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 15:21 |
| 00260 |
Re: SML: Second Try |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 15:25 |
| 00242 |
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-10 15:26 |
| 00286 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 15:28 |
| 00230 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-10 15:31 |
| 00267 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 15:32 |
| 00216 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 15:33 |
| 00229 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Don Box
|
2003-02-10 15:35 |
| 00270 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 15:38 |
| 00214 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-10 15:38 |
| 00283 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-10 15:40 |
| 00272 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 15:53 |
| 00280 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 15:57 |
| 00363 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 16:03 |
| 00377 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-10 16:11 |
| 00320 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-10 16:17 |
| 00319 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2003-02-10 16:18 |
| 00334 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Peter Jacobi
|
2003-02-10 16:19 |
| 00333 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 16:25 |
| 00378 |
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Doug Ransom
|
2003-02-10 16:26 |
| 00361 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 16:28 |
| 00376 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-10 16:29 |
| 00365 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 16:32 |
| 00350 |
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Marcin Roslonski
|
2003-02-10 16:33 |
| 00338 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-10 16:35 |
| 00398 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 16:36 |
| 00407 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 16:40 |
| 00408 |
ANN: Topologi Collaborative Markup Editor 1.1.1 |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-10 16:47 |
| 00397 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 16:50 |
| 00340 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 16:51 |
| 00349 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 16:53 |
| 00351 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-10 16:58 |
| 00336 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 17:01 |
| 00335 |
XForms and "InfoPath" |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-10 17:11 |
| 00409 |
Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-10 17:13 |
| 00353 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-10 17:13 |
| 00396 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-10 17:14 |
| 00395 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 17:20 |
| 00352 |
Best way to represent fractional values? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-10 17:47 |
| 00410 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Dave Pawson
|
2003-02-10 17:47 |
| 00337 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-10 18:01 |
| 00348 |
Re: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-10 18:04 |
| 00339 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-10 18:13 |
| 00374 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 18:17 |
| 00366 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 18:21 |
| 00321 |
Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language (Was: SML: Second Try) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-10 18:25 |
| 00332 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-10 18:35 |
| 00331 |
RE: Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language (Was: SML: Second Try) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 18:37 |
| 00322 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-10 18:51 |
| 00364 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-10 18:56 |
| 00375 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-10 18:59 |
| 00362 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-10 19:04 |
| 00379 |
OpenOffice.org Conference (OOoCon 2003) - Call for Papers |
Erwin Tenhumberg
|
2003-02-10 19:09 |
| 00404 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-10 19:11 |
| 00389 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-10 19:12 |
| 00341 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Miles Sabin
|
2003-02-10 19:16 |
| 00359 |
Re: Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 19:22 |
| 00358 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 19:25 |
| 00343 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-10 19:27 |
| 00387 |
Re: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Amelia A Lewis
|
2003-02-10 19:31 |
| 00405 |
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft XMLReader |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-10 19:33 |
| 00392 |
RE: [xml-dev] Best way to represent fractional values? |
Rodriguez, Sergio
|
2003-02-10 20:54 |
| 00403 |
RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-10 22:11 |
| 00316 |
xsi:type and unions |
Alessandro Triglia
|
2003-02-10 23:22 |
| 00325 |
Lame patent application of the day |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-10 23:59 |
| 00381 |
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and unions |
Jeni Tennison
|
2003-02-11 00:48 |
| 00373 |
Re: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Ian Graham
|
2003-02-11 02:34 |
| 00371 |
Serializing doc + entities |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-11 05:58 |
| 00382 |
Re: [xml-dev] Different kind of Editor |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-11 09:42 |
| 00324 |
patent application (MSFT) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-11 14:55 |
| 00326 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-11 15:06 |
| 00313 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-11 15:11 |
| 00318 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
m batsis
|
2003-02-11 15:13 |
| 00330 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-11 15:22 |
| 00311 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-11 15:23 |
| 00369 |
Please help |
thamy logan
|
2003-02-11 15:43 |
| 00384 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Mitch Amiano
|
2003-02-11 16:29 |
| 00385 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-11 16:36 |
| 00368 |
Re: [xml-dev] Please help |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-11 16:58 |
| 00327 |
question concerning parsing entity references in xslt |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-11 17:11 |
| 00315 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Lauren Wood
|
2003-02-11 17:12 |
| 00317 |
RE: [xml-dev] Please help |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-11 17:16 |
| 00323 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-11 17:19 |
| 00393 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
james anderson
|
2003-02-11 17:41 |
| 00400 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Jeff Greif
|
2003-02-11 17:43 |
| 00357 |
RE: [xml-dev] question concerning parsing entity references in xslt |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-11 17:48 |
| 00344 |
Re: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT) |
Rodriguez, Sergio
|
2003-02-11 17:55 |
| 00347 |
RE: [xml-dev] patent application (MSFT)--some prior art? |
James Governor
|
2003-02-11 17:58 |
| 00354 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language |
Dave Pawson
|
2003-02-11 18:39 |
| 00401 |
Udell & Dickerson, good reading |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-11 18:40 |
| 00391 |
RE: [xml-dev] Udell & Dickerson, good reading |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-11 18:55 |
| 00406 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-11 19:15 |
| 00346 |
RE: [xml-dev] Lame patent application of the day |
Doug Ransom
|
2003-02-11 21:57 |
| 00355 |
RE: [xml-dev] Lame patent application of the day |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-11 22:09 |
| 00402 |
RE: [xml-dev] Lame patent application of the day |
Doug Ransom
|
2003-02-11 22:36 |
| 00390 |
RE: [xml-dev] Lame patent application of the day |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-11 22:45 |
| 00394 |
Re: [xml-dev] Lame patent application of the day |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-11 23:04 |
| 00399 |
Re: [xml-dev] Udell & Dickerson, good reading |
Bill Humphries
|
2003-02-12 01:49 |
| 00356 |
Re: [xml-dev] question concerning parsing entity references in xslt |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-12 02:27 |
| 00345 |
RE: [xml-dev] Udell & Dickerson, good reading |
Don Park
|
2003-02-12 04:25 |
| 00360 |
utf8 -> utf16 conversion problem ? |
Alex Ben-Ari
|
2003-02-12 09:34 |
| 00342 |
rdf uri subject question |
bryan
|
2003-02-12 13:15 |
| 00386 |
Re: [xml-dev] rdf uri subject question |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-12 13:43 |
| 00367 |
RE: [xml-dev] Udell & Dickerson, good reading |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-12 14:49 |
| 00314 |
Error parsing & |
Long, Craig Z
|
2003-02-12 16:52 |
| 00328 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-12 17:02 |
| 00329 |
what is MOPs? |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-12 18:03 |
| 00312 |
xml for presentations |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-12 18:06 |
| 00370 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-12 18:18 |
| 00383 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-12 18:26 |
| 00372 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Dave Pawson
|
2003-02-12 18:32 |
| 00380 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Wendell Piez
|
2003-02-12 18:37 |
| 00463 |
more MOPs |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-12 18:48 |
| 00434 |
Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-12 19:20 |
| 00477 |
RE: more MOPs |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-12 19:20 |
| 00420 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-12 20:05 |
| 00433 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-12 20:12 |
| 00419 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Betty Harvey
|
2003-02-12 20:27 |
| 00478 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-12 20:28 |
| 00461 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-12 20:35 |
| 00476 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-12 20:37 |
| 00465 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-12 21:07 |
| 00450 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-12 21:27 |
| 00438 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-12 22:32 |
| 00506 |
New tool for handling XML in Java |
Samir Kothari
|
2003-02-12 22:52 |
| 00497 |
RE: [xml-dev] Error parsing & |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-12 22:55 |
| 00507 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-12 22:57 |
| 00496 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-12 22:59 |
| 00440 |
RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-12 23:08 |
| 00449 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-12 23:12 |
| 00436 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-12 23:46 |
| 00451 |
Xalan 2,4,1 URIResolver problems with JDK 1.4.1 |
Andrzej Jan Taramina
|
2003-02-12 23:49 |
| 00435 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-13 00:16 |
| 00453 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Michael R. Hahn
|
2003-02-13 00:19 |
| 00508 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-13 00:34 |
| 00495 |
finding new directions |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-13 03:27 |
| 00509 |
RE: [xml-dev] what is MOPs? |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-13 03:48 |
| 00475 |
RE: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-13 03:54 |
| 00452 |
XML for Astronomy/Astrophysics |
Jeff Rafter
|
2003-02-13 04:25 |
| 00437 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for Astronomy/Astrophysics |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-13 06:18 |
| 00448 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-13 07:05 |
| 00439 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Charles White
|
2003-02-13 07:27 |
| 00474 |
Re: [xml-dev] xml for presentations |
Simon North
|
2003-02-13 08:49 |
| 00466 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-13 09:54 |
| 00421 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-13 10:01 |
| 00432 |
New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Shigeru Yoshida
|
2003-02-13 10:08 |
| 00431 |
RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-13 11:59 |
| 00464 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-13 12:25 |
| 00422 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-13 12:26 |
| 00462 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-13 12:50 |
| 00479 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-13 12:50 |
| 00503 |
Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-13 13:31 |
| 00489 |
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSRM TC (Reliable Messaging) |
Karl Best
|
2003-02-13 13:32 |
| 00441 |
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSDM TC (Distributed Mgmt) |
Karl Best
|
2003-02-13 13:35 |
| 00459 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack [data + context = information] |
James Governor
|
2003-02-13 13:40 |
| 00458 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-13 13:44 |
| 00443 |
Re: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-13 13:47 |
| 00504 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-13 14:16 |
| 00487 |
Re: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java) |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-13 14:20 |
| 00492 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-13 14:56 |
| 00502 |
Re: [xml-dev] web services stack |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-13 15:55 |
| 00416 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-13 16:11 |
| 00425 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-13 16:33 |
| 00481 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Fabio Simeoni
|
2003-02-13 17:10 |
| 00473 |
Picking the Standard (WAS RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-13 17:21 |
| 00471 |
Re: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-13 17:42 |
| 00482 |
how to connect jtree node |
Bill Yao
|
2003-02-13 17:53 |
| 00424 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-13 18:45 |
| 00418 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: Ne w tool for handlingXML in Java) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-13 20:41 |
| 00426 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack [data + context = information] |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-13 21:25 |
| 00413 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack [data + context = information] |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-13 21:39 |
| 00430 |
Re: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-13 21:44 |
| 00411 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Andrew Dubinsky
|
2003-02-13 21:56 |
| 00469 |
Re: [xml-dev] headers (was ERH on Web Services |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-13 23:34 |
| 00484 |
Re: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-13 23:36 |
| 00485 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-14 00:21 |
| 00468 |
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: Ne w tool for handlingXML in Java) |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-14 00:53 |
| 00415 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Shigeru Yoshida
|
2003-02-14 02:09 |
| 00427 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Eric Johnson
|
2003-02-14 16:11 |
| 00417 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-14 16:26 |
| 00423 |
RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java |
Samir Kothari
|
2003-02-14 16:44 |
| 00491 |
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services |
Uche Ogbuji
|
2003-02-14 18:40 |
| 00493 |
If prefix is exactly 'xml' |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-14 19:16 |
| 00499 |
Re: [xml-dev] If prefix is exactly 'xml' |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-14 19:19 |
| 00457 |
XML Schema Regex Pattern Question |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-14 20:17 |
| 00444 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Regex Pattern Question |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-14 20:33 |
| 00447 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Regex Pattern Question |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-14 20:44 |
| 00454 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Regex Pattern Question |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-14 20:46 |
| 00500 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Regex Pattern Question |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-14 20:52 |
| 00505 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Shigeru Yoshida
|
2003-02-15 04:16 |
| 00488 |
RE: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-15 11:31 |
| 00446 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-15 13:10 |
| 00455 |
Remembering the original XML vision |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-15 13:30 |
| 00501 |
Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-15 14:33 |
| 00490 |
re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-15 15:26 |
| 00494 |
re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-15 15:42 |
| 00498 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-15 16:03 |
| 00456 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-15 16:19 |
| 00445 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
G. Ken Holman
|
2003-02-15 16:37 |
| 00460 |
How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-15 17:26 |
| 00442 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-15 18:10 |
| 00486 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-15 18:35 |
| 00467 |
Re: [xml-dev] If prefix is exactly 'xml' |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-15 19:00 |
| 00414 |
Re: [xml-dev] If prefix is exactly 'xml' |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-15 19:25 |
| 00428 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-15 20:05 |
| 00429 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-15 21:24 |
| 00412 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-15 21:58 |
| 00470 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-15 22:38 |
| 00483 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-16 05:36 |
| 00472 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-16 09:09 |
| 00480 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-16 10:34 |
| 00562 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-16 11:44 |
| 00576 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-16 17:19 |
| 00533 |
Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-16 17:35 |
| 00518 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-16 17:35 |
| 00519 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-16 17:54 |
| 00532 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-16 19:08 |
| 00577 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-16 19:16 |
| 00560 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-16 20:04 |
| 00575 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-16 20:08 |
| 00564 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-16 21:58 |
| 00549 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-16 22:05 |
| 00537 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-16 22:48 |
| 00597 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-17 00:30 |
| 00606 |
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance |
Shigeru Yoshida
|
2003-02-17 00:59 |
| 00607 |
Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-17 01:29 |
| 00596 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-17 02:42 |
| 00565 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-17 03:14 |
| 00539 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Charles White
|
2003-02-17 03:54 |
| 00548 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-17 04:03 |
| 00535 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-17 04:24 |
| 00550 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Charles White
|
2003-02-17 04:28 |
| 00534 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 04:40 |
| 00521 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 04:43 |
| 00552 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-17 04:45 |
| 00608 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-17 04:49 |
| 00595 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-17 04:59 |
| 00594 |
BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Don Box
|
2003-02-17 05:02 |
| 00551 |
Re: [xml-dev] BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Martin Bravenboer
|
2003-02-17 08:27 |
| 00609 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jochen Wiedmann
|
2003-02-17 08:27 |
| 00536 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-17 09:41 |
| 00547 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-17 09:46 |
| 00538 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-17 09:56 |
| 00573 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Miles Sabin
|
2003-02-17 10:19 |
| 00520 |
RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-17 13:00 |
| 00531 |
RXP test release for XML 1.1 and Namespaces 1.1 |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-17 13:09 |
| 00530 |
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Education XML TC |
Karl Best
|
2003-02-17 13:13 |
| 00563 |
Re: [xml-dev] BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 14:19 |
| 00574 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 14:34 |
| 00578 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-17 14:56 |
| 00561 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-17 14:57 |
| 00603 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 15:32 |
| 00588 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-17 15:36 |
| 00540 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-17 15:41 |
| 00558 |
RE: [xml-dev] BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Don Box
|
2003-02-17 16:08 |
| 00557 |
Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
MURATA Makoto
|
2003-02-17 16:34 |
| 00542 |
Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-17 17:03 |
| 00586 |
Safari and XSLT |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-17 18:26 |
| 00604 |
Re: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-17 18:54 |
| 00602 |
Re: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-17 18:55 |
| 00591 |
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
James Clark
|
2003-02-17 18:56 |
| 00572 |
Re: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-17 19:25 |
| 00524 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-17 19:28 |
| 00515 |
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-17 19:28 |
| 00580 |
Re: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Charles White
|
2003-02-17 19:29 |
| 00570 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-17 20:11 |
| 00581 |
Full-text search in XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery 1.0 |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-17 21:11 |
| 00523 |
RE: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-17 21:15 |
| 00517 |
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
Jirka Kosek
|
2003-02-17 21:35 |
| 00525 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 01:49 |
| 00512 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Mike Plusch
|
2003-02-18 03:26 |
| 00529 |
Re: [xml-dev] Safari and XSLT |
Bill Humphries
|
2003-02-18 04:49 |
| 00510 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 05:10 |
| 00568 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 05:17 |
| 00583 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Charles White
|
2003-02-18 06:46 |
| 00584 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 06:53 |
| 00567 |
Re: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Charles White
|
2003-02-18 07:03 |
| 00514 |
[ANN] eXchaNGeR (XML Browser + Editor) v1.0 |
Edwin Dankert
|
2003-02-18 09:40 |
| 00526 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-18 09:53 |
| 00516 |
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-18 09:56 |
| 00522 |
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-18 10:04 |
| 00592 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-18 11:38 |
| 00599 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-18 12:11 |
| 00556 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 12:22 |
| 00543 |
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-18 12:28 |
| 00546 |
Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 12:42 |
| 00553 |
What is the value of XForms? (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-18 12:59 |
| 00600 |
XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-18 13:02 |
| 00590 |
Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 14:27 |
| 00605 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-18 14:30 |
| 00587 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 14:43 |
| 00545 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-18 14:59 |
| 00554 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 15:02 |
| 00601 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 15:04 |
| 00589 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 15:15 |
| 00593 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 15:17 |
| 00598 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 15:18 |
| 00544 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-18 15:19 |
| 00555 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-18 15:21 |
| 00559 |
RE: [xml-dev] XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-18 15:22 |
| 00541 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Mike Plusch
|
2003-02-18 15:54 |
| 00585 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-18 15:57 |
| 00513 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 16:14 |
| 00566 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-18 16:15 |
| 00527 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 16:20 |
| 00528 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 16:23 |
| 00511 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 16:29 |
| 00569 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 16:30 |
| 00582 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Charles White
|
2003-02-18 16:39 |
| 00571 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 16:40 |
| 00579 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
2003-02-18 16:57 |
| 00661 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 17:01 |
| 00674 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-18 17:13 |
| 00632 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Owen Walcher
|
2003-02-18 17:15 |
| 00618 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
|
2003-02-18 17:21 |
| 00631 |
Google as Big Brother |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 17:31 |
| 00675 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 17:34 |
| 00659 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Lisa Rein
|
2003-02-18 17:50 |
| 00673 |
OT: Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Seairth Jacobs
|
2003-02-18 18:21 |
| 00648 |
RE: Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 18:50 |
| 00636 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 19:04 |
| 00694 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-18 19:08 |
| 00703 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 19:09 |
| 00693 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-18 19:14 |
| 00704 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jochen Wiedmann
|
2003-02-18 19:28 |
| 00638 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 19:34 |
| 00647 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-18 19:39 |
| 00662 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
|
2003-02-18 19:44 |
| 00634 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jochen Wiedmann
|
2003-02-18 19:56 |
| 00672 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
|
2003-02-18 20:03 |
| 00649 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-18 20:21 |
| 00666 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
2003-02-18 20:49 |
| 00633 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
2003-02-18 20:53 |
| 00651 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 21:20 |
| 00705 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Justin Lipton
|
2003-02-18 21:23 |
| 00692 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 21:33 |
| 00691 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 21:34 |
| 00706 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-18 21:35 |
| 00650 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 21:38 |
| 00635 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 21:44 |
| 00646 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 21:48 |
| 00637 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 21:52 |
| 00671 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 21:53 |
| 00663 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 21:57 |
| 00619 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 22:01 |
| 00629 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-18 22:02 |
| 00630 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 22:03 |
| 00620 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 22:05 |
| 00660 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 22:12 |
| 00700 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 22:17 |
| 00676 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 22:17 |
| 00686 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Ralph Hilken
|
2003-02-18 22:24 |
| 00639 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-18 22:29 |
| 00657 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-18 22:30 |
| 00656 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-18 22:35 |
| 00684 |
"Non-Normative" |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-18 22:38 |
| 00641 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-18 22:39 |
| 00701 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Gustaf Liljegren
|
2003-02-18 22:41 |
| 00699 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-18 23:00 |
| 00615 |
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-18 23:15 |
| 00623 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-18 23:40 |
| 00678 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-18 23:40 |
| 00670 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-18 23:41 |
| 00668 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-18 23:45 |
| 00679 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-18 23:57 |
| 00622 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-18 23:58 |
| 00617 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Joe English
|
2003-02-19 00:23 |
| 00624 |
Historical question about namespaces |
Gustaf Liljegren
|
2003-02-19 00:31 |
| 00628 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
2003-02-19 00:42 |
| 00612 |
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-19 00:42 |
| 00610 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-19 01:02 |
| 00681 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-19 04:07 |
| 00682 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-19 05:02 |
| 00665 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 05:06 |
| 00614 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-19 05:28 |
| 00625 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 05:35 |
| 00616 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 05:57 |
| 00621 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 06:23 |
| 00689 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 06:34 |
| 00696 |
Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Jochen Wiedmann
|
2003-02-19 06:58 |
| 00655 |
RE: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-19 09:02 |
| 00652 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Jeni Tennison
|
2003-02-19 11:14 |
| 00697 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-19 12:14 |
| 00688 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-19 12:18 |
| 00685 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-19 12:23 |
| 00702 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 12:26 |
| 00644 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-19 12:40 |
| 00653 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-19 13:51 |
| 00698 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-19 13:55 |
| 00687 |
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-19 14:20 |
| 00690 |
Re: [xml-dev] Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-19 14:34 |
| 00695 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 15:03 |
| 00654 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 15:16 |
| 00643 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Mike Plusch
|
2003-02-19 15:18 |
| 00658 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-19 15:19 |
| 00640 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Doug Rudder
|
2003-02-19 15:31 |
| 00759 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-19 15:32 |
| 00683 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Oleg Tkachenko
|
2003-02-19 15:41 |
| 00664 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-19 15:43 |
| 00626 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-19 15:45 |
| 00613 |
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" |
Hugh Wallis
|
2003-02-19 15:45 |
| 00627 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-19 15:48 |
| 00611 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-19 15:50 |
| 00667 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-19 15:54 |
| 00680 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Tony Graham
|
2003-02-19 15:58 |
| 00669 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Tony Graham
|
2003-02-19 15:59 |
| 00773 |
Re: [xml-dev] "Non-Normative" |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-19 16:01 |
| 00677 |
Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-19 16:02 |
| 00730 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-19 16:05 |
| 00715 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-19 16:11 |
| 00716 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 16:15 |
| 00729 |
Fw: Report to Sender |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-19 16:22 |
| 00774 |
RE: [xml-dev] Fw: Report to Sender |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 16:33 |
| 00757 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-19 16:35 |
| 00772 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Doug Rudder
|
2003-02-19 16:41 |
| 00761 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 16:46 |
| 00746 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 16:54 |
| 00794 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Wendell Piez
|
2003-02-19 17:19 |
| 00803 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Wendell Piez
|
2003-02-19 18:14 |
| 00734 |
SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-19 18:48 |
| 00804 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-19 19:09 |
| 00793 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-19 19:14 |
| 00736 |
[xml-dev] XBRL loan applications [Was: Re:Are the publishing user s happy? Why not?] |
Ralph Hilken
|
2003-02-19 19:18 |
| 00745 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-19 19:18 |
| 00732 |
RE: [xml-dev] print people |
Ed Dodds
|
2003-02-19 19:32 |
| 00747 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-19 20:14 |
| 00731 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-19 20:28 |
| 00749 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-19 20:53 |
| 00805 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-19 21:20 |
| 00792 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-19 21:52 |
| 00791 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-19 21:56 |
| 00806 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-19 21:57 |
| 00748 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-19 21:59 |
| 00733 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-19 22:01 |
| 00744 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-19 22:10 |
| 00735 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-19 22:52 |
| 00642 |
XMLDOM Create object problem |
asim
|
2003-02-19 22:52 |
| 00770 |
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-19 23:17 |
| 00762 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Jim Ancona
|
2003-02-19 23:21 |
| 00717 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-19 23:24 |
| 00728 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Doug Royer
|
2003-02-19 23:52 |
| 00645 |
Re: [xml-dev] XMLDOM Create object problem |
asim
|
2003-02-19 23:55 |
| 00727 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-20 00:44 |
| 00718 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-20 01:10 |
| 00760 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Paul Prescod
|
2003-02-20 01:15 |
| 00771 |
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-20 03:37 |
| 00758 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-20 12:49 |
| 00775 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-20 13:46 |
| 00785 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-20 14:34 |
| 00800 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Jeff Rafter
|
2003-02-20 14:40 |
| 00737 |
data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices |
Enoch Root
|
2003-02-20 15:38 |
| 00755 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-20 15:58 |
| 00754 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-20 16:02 |
| 00739 |
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-20 16:45 |
| 00783 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-20 16:51 |
| 00801 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-20 17:00 |
| 00788 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-20 17:08 |
| 00799 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-20 17:35 |
| 00712 |
Re: [xml-dev] data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-20 18:02 |
| 00721 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-20 18:12 |
| 00777 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Richard Tobin
|
2003-02-20 18:50 |
| 00769 |
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-20 18:56 |
| 00767 |
Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-20 19:58 |
| 00778 |
Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-20 20:24 |
| 00720 |
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-20 20:40 |
| 00714 |
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-20 20:45 |
| 00722 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-20 20:49 |
| 00709 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-20 20:53 |
| 00726 |
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-20 21:30 |
| 00707 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-20 21:35 |
| 00765 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-20 21:44 |
| 00780 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Shawn Parker
|
2003-02-20 21:46 |
| 00781 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-20 21:55 |
| 00764 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-20 22:10 |
| 00711 |
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-21 00:07 |
| 00723 |
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-21 00:50 |
| 00713 |
COLAG Version 2.0 |
Rahul Jain
|
2003-02-21 02:34 |
| 00719 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Paul Brown
|
2003-02-21 04:01 |
| 00789 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-21 09:15 |
| 00796 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-21 10:14 |
| 00753 |
The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 12:16 |
| 00740 |
MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix |
Anuga Laxmi Kanth Reddy
|
2003-02-21 12:55 |
| 00743 |
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix |
Jeni Tennison
|
2003-02-21 13:05 |
| 00750 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-21 13:40 |
| 00797 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 13:58 |
| 00787 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-21 14:08 |
| 00802 |
RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-21 14:18 |
| 00784 |
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-21 14:29 |
| 00751 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-21 14:30 |
| 00742 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill Kearney
|
2003-02-21 14:31 |
| 00798 |
RE: [xml-dev] MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-21 15:06 |
| 00786 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 15:13 |
| 00795 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-21 15:22 |
| 00790 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-21 15:22 |
| 00752 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-21 15:22 |
| 00741 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-21 15:27 |
| 00738 |
RE: Open Source or Else |
Andrzej Jan Taramina
|
2003-02-21 15:30 |
| 00756 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-21 15:30 |
| 00782 |
RE: [xml-dev] RE: Open Source or Else |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-21 15:45 |
| 00763 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-21 15:57 |
| 00724 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 16:06 |
| 00725 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 16:11 |
| 00710 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-21 16:15 |
| 00708 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-21 16:21 |
| 00766 |
nillable keyrefs in XSD |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-21 17:01 |
| 00779 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-21 17:52 |
| 00768 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-21 18:10 |
| 00776 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-21 18:19 |
| 00858 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-21 18:33 |
| 00871 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-21 18:58 |
| 00830 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-21 19:01 |
| 00815 |
XQuery and SQL Server Yukon |
Charles White
|
2003-02-21 19:20 |
| 00816 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Mike Fitzgerald
|
2003-02-21 19:31 |
| 00829 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-21 19:41 |
| 00870 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-21 20:53 |
| 00860 |
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery and SQL Server Yukon |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-21 20:58 |
| 00846 |
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery and SQL Server Yukon |
Charles White
|
2003-02-21 21:27 |
| 00834 |
Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-22 01:13 |
| 00890 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-22 01:56 |
| 00899 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 02:50 |
| 00900 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Amelia A.Lewis
|
2003-02-22 03:04 |
| 00889 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Martin Soukup
|
2003-02-22 03:28 |
| 00836 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 05:39 |
| 00845 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-22 05:41 |
| 00832 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 05:41 |
| 00847 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 06:06 |
| 00831 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Evan Lenz
|
2003-02-22 06:49 |
| 00849 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 07:03 |
| 00901 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-22 10:21 |
| 00888 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Fredrik Lindgren
|
2003-02-22 11:33 |
| 00887 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-22 11:54 |
| 00902 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Martin Soukup
|
2003-02-22 14:37 |
| 00848 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Martin Soukup
|
2003-02-22 14:41 |
| 00833 |
The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-22 14:57 |
| 00844 |
Parsing Performance |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-22 15:00 |
| 00835 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-22 15:14 |
| 00868 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-22 15:27 |
| 00861 |
More on Parsing Performance |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-22 15:53 |
| 00817 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-22 16:08 |
| 00828 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-22 16:24 |
| 00827 |
The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-22 17:10 |
| 00818 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Don Bate
|
2003-02-22 17:32 |
| 00859 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-22 17:47 |
| 00869 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 18:26 |
| 00857 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-22 18:32 |
| 00872 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 18:58 |
| 00896 |
Re: [xml-dev] More on Parsing Performance |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-22 19:10 |
| 00881 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 19:15 |
| 00855 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 19:18 |
| 00837 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-22 19:20 |
| 00854 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 19:22 |
| 00839 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 19:23 |
| 00879 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 19:41 |
| 00897 |
re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-22 19:47 |
| 00884 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-22 19:54 |
| 00895 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-22 20:04 |
| 00812 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-22 20:09 |
| 00821 |
RE: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Don Park
|
2003-02-22 21:12 |
| 00874 |
xml/xsl won't display when used online |
James Rayner
|
2003-02-23 01:22 |
| 00867 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-23 01:59 |
| 00820 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric Snell
|
2003-02-23 12:09 |
| 00814 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-23 12:33 |
| 00822 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-23 12:48 |
| 00809 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Jeff Rafter
|
2003-02-23 14:45 |
| 00826 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-23 15:37 |
| 00807 |
Re: [xml-dev] Serializing doc + entities |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-23 15:46 |
| 00864 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-23 17:34 |
| 00876 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-23 17:54 |
| 00877 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-23 17:58 |
| 00863 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-23 18:11 |
| 00811 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-23 18:23 |
| 00823 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-23 18:29 |
| 00813 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-23 18:39 |
| 00819 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-23 18:46 |
| 00885 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-23 18:54 |
| 00892 |
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-23 19:21 |
| 00853 |
Entity declarations and non-validating parsers |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-23 19:28 |
| 00840 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-23 19:33 |
| 00843 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-23 19:37 |
| 00850 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-23 19:53 |
| 00883 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-23 20:36 |
| 00893 |
Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-23 20:36 |
| 00898 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-23 21:10 |
| 00880 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-23 21:26 |
| 00842 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-23 21:33 |
| 00851 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-23 21:46 |
| 00894 |
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-23 21:51 |
| 00882 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-23 21:55 |
| 00886 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-23 21:58 |
| 00891 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
Berend de Boer
|
2003-02-23 22:14 |
| 00852 |
SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project |
Mark Priest
|
2003-02-23 22:21 |
| 00841 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-23 23:03 |
| 00856 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Miles Sabin
|
2003-02-23 23:20 |
| 00838 |
Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mike Kozlowski
|
2003-02-23 23:58 |
| 00878 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-24 00:17 |
| 00862 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-24 00:36 |
| 00810 |
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers |
Jeff Rafter
|
2003-02-24 03:12 |
| 00824 |
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-24 03:18 |
| 00825 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-24 03:25 |
| 00808 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-24 03:37 |
| 00865 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision) |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-24 03:55 |
| 00875 |
Re: [xml-dev] Entity declarations and non-validating parsers |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-24 03:56 |
| 00866 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-24 03:59 |
| 00873 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-24 04:10 |
| 00955 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-24 06:25 |
| 00969 |
[ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003 |
Sam Hunting
|
2003-02-24 07:08 |
| 00911 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 10:49 |
| 00925 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 11:01 |
| 00970 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP |
Joe Fawcett
|
2003-02-24 11:11 |
| 00953 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 11:18 |
| 00957 |
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
Martin Soukup
|
2003-02-24 12:02 |
| 00942 |
XML for RFCs |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 12:07 |
| 00930 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-24 12:25 |
| 00990 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
bryan
|
2003-02-24 12:48 |
| 00999 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 13:02 |
| 00989 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
bryan
|
2003-02-24 13:10 |
| 01000 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
Miloslav Nic
|
2003-02-24 13:10 |
| 00932 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 13:15 |
| 00941 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
bryan
|
2003-02-24 13:20 |
| 00928 |
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-24 13:27 |
| 00943 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML for RFCs |
Miloslav Nic
|
2003-02-24 13:37 |
| 00945 |
Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? |
Collin
|
2003-02-24 13:46 |
| 00927 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-24 13:47 |
| 01001 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-24 13:47 |
| 00988 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-24 14:11 |
| 00987 |
RE: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The s ubsetting has begun) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 14:23 |
| 01002 |
Re: [xml-dev] Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-24 14:45 |
| 00944 |
No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performanc e) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 15:06 |
| 00929 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Mark Baker
|
2003-02-24 15:16 |
| 00940 |
RE: [xml-dev] Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them? |
Michael Kay
|
2003-02-24 16:35 |
| 00931 |
Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch |
Lauren Wood
|
2003-02-24 17:10 |
| 00966 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-24 17:36 |
| 00958 |
OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-24 17:40 |
| 00913 |
re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-24 17:57 |
| 00924 |
Re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?) |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-24 17:58 |
| 00923 |
DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Ken Sall
|
2003-02-24 18:22 |
| 00914 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-24 18:56 |
| 00956 |
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-24 19:09 |
| 00967 |
Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selecte d XML files |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-24 19:17 |
| 00971 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-24 19:20 |
| 00954 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-24 19:22 |
| 00996 |
RE: [xml-dev] Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files |
Julian Reschke
|
2003-02-24 19:29 |
| 00981 |
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Julian Reschke
|
2003-02-24 19:32 |
| 00933 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 19:33 |
| 00974 |
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-24 20:54 |
| 00951 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 20:57 |
| 00950 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-24 21:12 |
| 00935 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 21:17 |
| 00979 |
FW: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 21:58 |
| 00926 |
Transformation Error , PLZ HELP |
asim
|
2003-02-24 22:11 |
| 00997 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-24 22:12 |
| 00984 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-24 22:19 |
| 00995 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-24 22:24 |
| 00908 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-24 22:33 |
| 00917 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-24 22:55 |
| 00973 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-24 22:58 |
| 00965 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-24 23:05 |
| 00918 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-24 23:16 |
| 00963 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-24 23:35 |
| 00912 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP |
asim
|
2003-02-24 23:59 |
| 00916 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 00:01 |
| 00910 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 00:14 |
| 00968 |
Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP |
asim
|
2003-02-25 00:28 |
| 00905 |
Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-25 00:38 |
| 00922 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-25 00:43 |
| 00903 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-25 00:49 |
| 00961 |
re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-25 00:58 |
| 00976 |
Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-25 00:58 |
| 00977 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-25 01:22 |
| 00960 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-25 01:29 |
| 00907 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 01:31 |
| 00919 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 01:37 |
| 00909 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 01:38 |
| 00985 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Joe English
|
2003-02-25 01:45 |
| 00915 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-25 01:47 |
| 00992 |
Re: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Thomas B. Passin
|
2003-02-25 01:55 |
| 00949 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-25 03:10 |
| 00936 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 05:56 |
| 00939 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 06:00 |
| 00946 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 06:06 |
| 00993 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 06:16 |
| 00983 |
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25 |
Tech Support
|
2003-02-25 09:10 |
| 00998 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 09:28 |
| 00980 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-25 09:50 |
| 00938 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-25 10:08 |
| 00947 |
Call for information about XML-Fragments |
MASSIMILIANO GRANDI
|
2003-02-25 10:51 |
| 00994 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 10:57 |
| 00982 |
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-25 11:08 |
| 00986 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 11:11 |
| 00991 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-25 12:11 |
| 00948 |
special characters |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-25 12:14 |
| 00937 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-25 12:50 |
| 00952 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-25 13:31 |
| 00978 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-25 13:43 |
| 00959 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-25 13:48 |
| 00934 |
Re: [xml-dev] special characters |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-25 13:59 |
| 00906 |
pure XML syntax tools |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 14:24 |
| 00920 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 14:29 |
| 00921 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-25 14:34 |
| 00904 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 14:42 |
| 00962 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 14:44 |
| 00975 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 14:48 |
| 00964 |
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 14:52 |
| 00972 |
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-25 14:54 |
| 01055 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 14:58 |
| 01069 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 14:59 |
| 01026 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 15:14 |
| 01011 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Joe English
|
2003-02-25 15:16 |
| 01012 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 15:21 |
| 01025 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 15:28 |
| 01053 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 15:48 |
| 01070 |
Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-25 15:48 |
| 01068 |
Infoset vs pure syntax permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-25 15:56 |
| 01057 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 16:04 |
| 01042 |
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 16:05 |
| 01030 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 16:13 |
| 01090 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 16:18 |
| 01099 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 16:24 |
| 01089 |
Re: [xml-dev] Infoset vs pure syntax permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 16:28 |
| 01100 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 16:28 |
| 01032 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 16:30 |
| 01041 |
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 16:34 |
| 01028 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-25 16:35 |
| 01043 |
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 16:39 |
| 01027 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-25 16:50 |
| 01045 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 17:00 |
| 01101 |
Some notes on the binxml permathread (was: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 17:13 |
| 01088 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 17:18 |
| 01087 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 17:19 |
| 01102 |
On permathreads |
bryan
|
2003-02-25 17:22 |
| 01044 |
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 17:30 |
| 01029 |
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 17:33 |
| 01040 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-25 17:35 |
| 01031 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-25 17:41 |
| 01066 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 18:07 |
| 01058 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 18:15 |
| 01024 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 18:19 |
| 01013 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 18:20 |
| 01023 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 18:24 |
| 01056 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 18:33 |
| 01014 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 18:33 |
| 01067 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Lauren Wood
|
2003-02-25 18:38 |
| 01054 |
Re: [xml-dev] special characters |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-25 18:40 |
| 01033 |
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
bryan
|
2003-02-25 18:43 |
| 01071 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-25 18:43 |
| 01081 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 18:45 |
| 01051 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-25 18:47 |
| 01096 |
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-25 18:47 |
| 01050 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 18:54 |
| 01079 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-25 18:56 |
| 01097 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-25 18:59 |
| 01035 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 18:59 |
| 01084 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 19:12 |
| 01095 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 19:12 |
| 01008 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 19:15 |
| 01063 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-25 19:18 |
| 01017 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 19:18 |
| 01073 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-25 19:20 |
| 01065 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 19:26 |
| 01074 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 19:35 |
| 01016 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 19:51 |
| 01010 |
collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 19:53 |
| 01018 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-25 19:53 |
| 01005 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 19:57 |
| 01022 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 19:58 |
| 01003 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 20:01 |
| 01061 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 20:14 |
| 01076 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 20:36 |
| 01077 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Kip Hampton
|
2003-02-25 20:43 |
| 01060 |
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not? |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-25 21:05 |
| 01007 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
J.Pietschmann
|
2003-02-25 21:15 |
| 01019 |
Xpath & conditional filters |
David Higgins
|
2003-02-25 21:27 |
| 01009 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-25 21:38 |
| 01015 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-25 21:53 |
| 01085 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 22:05 |
| 01092 |
Re: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Ken Sall
|
2003-02-25 22:25 |
| 01036 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-25 22:46 |
| 01049 |
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-25 22:46 |
| 01039 |
Re: [xml-dev] Call for information about XML-Fragments |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-25 23:02 |
| 01046 |
RE: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-25 23:04 |
| 01093 |
RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS |
Joshua Allen
|
2003-02-25 23:12 |
| 01083 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-25 23:24 |
| 01098 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 23:30 |
| 01080 |
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-25 23:33 |
| 01038 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-25 23:37 |
| 01047 |
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Joe English
|
2003-02-26 00:14 |
| 01094 |
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 00:20 |
| 01082 |
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-26 00:29 |
| 01086 |
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 00:43 |
| 01091 |
RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 01:02 |
| 01048 |
Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun) |
Joe English
|
2003-02-26 01:13 |
| 01037 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-26 01:19 |
| 01052 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-26 01:22 |
| 01034 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 02:05 |
| 01078 |
Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun) |
Ian Graham
|
2003-02-26 03:12 |
| 01059 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-26 03:17 |
| 01006 |
RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
bryan
|
2003-02-26 09:16 |
| 01120 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-26 09:52 |
| 01020 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-26 10:21 |
| 01021 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 10:53 |
| 01004 |
Re: [xml-dev] On permathreads |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 10:54 |
| 01062 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-26 11:09 |
| 01075 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-26 11:37 |
| 01072 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-26 11:46 |
| 01064 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 11:51 |
| 01155 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 12:22 |
| 01169 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-26 12:44 |
| 01111 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-26 13:09 |
| 01126 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 13:09 |
| 01112 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-26 14:05 |
| 01125 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-26 14:19 |
| 01170 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 14:38 |
| 01153 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 14:47 |
| 01168 |
Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-26 15:09 |
| 01157 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 15:18 |
| 01142 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 15:33 |
| 01130 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-26 16:06 |
| 01190 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-26 16:09 |
| 01199 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 16:18 |
| 01200 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 16:21 |
| 01189 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 16:23 |
| 01132 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 16:28 |
| 01141 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-26 16:30 |
| 01128 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-26 16:42 |
| 01201 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-26 16:45 |
| 01127 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
David Megginson
|
2003-02-26 16:46 |
| 01145 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-26 16:46 |
| 01143 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 16:47 |
| 01188 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 16:52 |
| 01187 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 17:01 |
| 01202 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 17:04 |
| 01144 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 17:20 |
| 01129 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 17:26 |
| 01140 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 17:31 |
| 01131 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-26 17:32 |
| 01166 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-26 17:38 |
| 01158 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 17:50 |
| 01113 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-26 17:50 |
| 01124 |
Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 17:54 |
| 01114 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 18:08 |
| 01123 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 18:09 |
| 01156 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 18:12 |
| 01167 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-26 18:12 |
| 01154 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-26 18:12 |
| 01171 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 18:16 |
| 01196 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 18:23 |
| 01181 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 18:24 |
| 01133 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 18:26 |
| 01163 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 18:26 |
| 01151 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 18:29 |
| 01150 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 18:33 |
| 01135 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
|
2003-02-26 18:40 |
| 01179 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-26 18:41 |
| 01197 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 18:51 |
| 01184 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-26 19:00 |
| 01195 |
New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-26 19:09 |
| 01108 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 19:10 |
| 01173 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-26 19:18 |
| 01117 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
james anderson
|
2003-02-26 19:25 |
| 01165 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-26 19:31 |
| 01116 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-26 19:44 |
| 01174 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-26 19:46 |
| 01110 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-26 20:01 |
| 01118 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 20:15 |
| 01105 |
XML for the Restaurant Industry |
Samuel Dorfman
|
2003-02-26 20:18 |
| 01122 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
|
2003-02-26 20:22 |
| 01103 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 20:28 |
| 01161 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-26 20:49 |
| 01176 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 20:52 |
| 01177 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 20:54 |
| 01160 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Matt
|
2003-02-26 20:58 |
| 01107 |
RE: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-26 21:00 |
| 01119 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 21:00 |
| 01109 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 21:04 |
| 01115 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 21:06 |
| 01185 |
Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Miles Sabin
|
2003-02-26 21:07 |
| 01192 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 21:08 |
| 01149 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 21:14 |
| 01136 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Sean McGrath
|
2003-02-26 21:23 |
| 01139 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 21:30 |
| 01146 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 21:39 |
| 01193 |
Which XML API? |
Joseph
|
2003-02-26 21:48 |
| 01183 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-26 21:49 |
| 01198 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Joe English
|
2003-02-26 22:04 |
| 01180 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-26 22:08 |
| 01138 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-26 22:14 |
| 01147 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-26 22:27 |
| 01159 |
Problematical scenarios |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-26 23:42 |
| 01106 |
Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-27 00:12 |
| 01194 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 00:27 |
| 01182 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 00:28 |
| 01186 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 00:46 |
| 01191 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-27 00:52 |
| 01148 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-27 00:56 |
| 01137 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-27 00:58 |
| 01152 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-27 01:08 |
| 01134 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Joe English
|
2003-02-27 01:51 |
| 01178 |
Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-27 03:23 |
| 01121 |
RE: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
Martin Soukup
|
2003-02-27 06:08 |
| 01104 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Rick Jelliffe
|
2003-02-27 06:17 |
| 01162 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
akmal @ city
|
2003-02-27 07:02 |
| 01175 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
Gregory Murphy
|
2003-02-27 07:23 |
| 01164 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric Snell
|
2003-02-27 08:53 |
| 01172 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 10:02 |
| 01254 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-27 11:31 |
| 01268 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 12:40 |
| 01225 |
The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 12:53 |
| 01269 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 13:06 |
| 01252 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 13:08 |
| 01267 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 13:11 |
| 01212 |
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-27 13:27 |
| 01211 |
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition |
Jeff Rafter
|
2003-02-27 13:28 |
| 01224 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 13:43 |
| 01241 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 14:28 |
| 01256 |
trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datat ype. |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-27 14:31 |
| 01229 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-27 14:39 |
| 01289 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 14:40 |
| 01298 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 15:09 |
| 01299 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 15:25 |
| 01240 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 15:26 |
| 01288 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Rich Salz
|
2003-02-27 15:27 |
| 01231 |
Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-27 15:32 |
| 01227 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-27 15:39 |
| 01242 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-27 16:02 |
| 01226 |
Re: [xml-dev] The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP] |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-27 16:03 |
| 01244 |
Re: [xml-dev] trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype. |
Jeff Greif
|
2003-02-27 16:27 |
| 01300 |
XML Parsers |
Michael Hoffman
|
2003-02-27 16:33 |
| 01287 |
Unicode With Angle Brackets |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-27 17:04 |
| 01286 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
Joe English
|
2003-02-27 17:07 |
| 01301 |
RE: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets |
Dare Obasanjo
|
2003-02-27 17:12 |
| 01243 |
Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-27 17:37 |
| 01228 |
Re: [xml-dev] Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...? |
Jonathan Robie
|
2003-02-27 17:39 |
| 01239 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-27 17:49 |
| 01230 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 18:03 |
| 01265 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 18:22 |
| 01257 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 18:39 |
| 01213 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 18:41 |
| 01223 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Alaric B. Snell
|
2003-02-27 18:48 |
| 01222 |
Markup: The Early Years |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-27 19:05 |
| 01214 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Martin Klang
|
2003-02-27 19:11 |
| 01255 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 19:30 |
| 01266 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-27 19:42 |
| 01253 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 19:45 |
| 01270 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 19:50 |
| 01295 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Dennis Sosnoski
|
2003-02-27 19:52 |
| 01280 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-27 19:58 |
| 01232 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 20:06 |
| 01250 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-27 20:09 |
| 01249 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-27 20:13 |
| 01234 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-27 20:17 |
| 01278 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Daniel Veillard
|
2003-02-27 20:29 |
| 01296 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-27 20:40 |
| 01283 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-27 20:44 |
| 01294 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Martin Klang
|
2003-02-27 22:31 |
| 01208 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-27 23:07 |
| 01217 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|
2003-02-27 23:10 |
| 01272 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-27 23:41 |
| 01203 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-28 05:43 |
| 01262 |
Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-28 11:12 |
| 01273 |
Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition |
[email protected]
|
2003-02-28 11:15 |
| 01216 |
Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????) |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-28 11:24 |
| 01210 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 14:26 |
| 01218 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-28 16:22 |
| 01260 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Tahir Hashmi
|
2003-02-28 16:36 |
| 01205 |
Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model |
Bill Riegel
|
2003-02-28 16:38 |
| 01221 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 16:43 |
| 01275 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-28 17:11 |
| 01276 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
Robin Berjon
|
2003-02-28 17:30 |
| 01259 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 18:05 |
| 01207 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-28 18:52 |
| 01209 |
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 19:23 |
| 01215 |
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-02-28 19:30 |
| 01284 |
XML - Disruptive Technology |
Doug Ransom
|
2003-02-28 19:50 |
| 01291 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-28 19:52 |
| 01248 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 20:00 |
| 01235 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:04 |
| 01238 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 20:06 |
| 01245 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:06 |
| 01292 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:14 |
| 01282 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Kian-Tat Lim
|
2003-02-28 20:17 |
| 01297 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:24 |
| 01279 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:29 |
| 01237 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 20:31 |
| 01246 |
XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) |
Elliotte Rusty Harold
|
2003-02-28 20:32 |
| 01293 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 20:33 |
| 01281 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Tim Bray
|
2003-02-28 20:34 |
| 01285 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 20:40 |
| 01290 |
Re: [xml-dev] XML Catalog support for .Net (and others) |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 20:42 |
| 01264 |
getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters |
asim
|
2003-02-28 20:47 |
| 01247 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 20:49 |
| 01236 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-28 20:59 |
| 01251 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Simon St.Laurent
|
2003-02-28 21:09 |
| 01233 |
Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'???? |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 21:10 |
| 01277 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-28 21:16 |
| 01258 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 21:20 |
| 01206 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? |
Norman Walsh
|
2003-02-28 21:23 |
| 01219 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 21:25 |
| 01220 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Cavnar-Johnson, John
|
2003-02-28 21:36 |
| 01204 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology |
Doug Ransom
|
2003-02-28 21:37 |
| 01261 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 21:37 |
| 01274 |
RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-28 21:43 |
| 01263 |
RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 21:44 |
| 01271 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-02-28 21:44 |
| 01310 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 21:47 |
| 01313 |
Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? |
Mike Champion
|
2003-02-28 21:52 |
| 01304 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Wendell Piez
|
2003-02-28 22:01 |
| 01305 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
|
2003-02-28 22:04 |
| 01302 |
Re: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-28 22:04 |
| 01303 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 22:08 |
| 01314 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 22:22 |
| 01309 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 22:35 |
| 01312 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Bill de hÓra
|
2003-02-28 22:40 |
| 01311 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 22:59 |
| 01308 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
W. E. Perry
|
2003-02-28 23:02 |
| 01306 |
RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Jeff Lowery
|
2003-02-28 23:04 |
| 01316 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
Chiusano Joseph
|
2003-02-28 23:09 |
| 01315 |
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces conformance tests |
Karl Waclawek
|
2003-03-01 00:49 |
| 01307 |
Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun |
John Cowan
|
2003-03-01 03:03 |
