| Synchronizing references across the WS-RX/SX/TX specifications |
3 |
2007-04-02 |
| Re: [ws-sx] Synchronizing references across the WS-RX/SX/TXspecifications |
2 |
2007-04-02 |
| Revised W3C WS-Policy 1.5 Candidate Recommendation Working Drafts |
1 |
2007-04-02 |
| Groups - ws-sp-usecases-examples-draft-12.doc (ws-sp-usecases-examples-draft-12-10.doc) uploaded |
2 |
2007-04-04 |
| Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon cancelled |
2 |
2007-04-04 |
| WS-SX TC Minutes, April 4, 2007 |
6 |
2007-04-04 |
| Request for WS-SecurityPolicy endorsements |
6 |
2007-04-04 |
| Groups - ws-sp-usecases-examples-draft-13.doc (ws-sp-usecases-examples-draft-13-02.doc) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-04 |
| Synchronizing references a Synchronizing references across theWS-RX/SX/TX specscross the WS-RX/SX/TX specs |
1 |
2007-04-05 |
| Issue PR024: SP document doesn't say how to get a value for thewsp: prefix |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR025: Clarify that consistent versions of WS-Policy andWS-PolicyAttachment specifications MUST be used |
2 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR026: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy Public Reviewdocument |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR027: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy Public Reviewdocument |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR028: Add reference to Message Transmission OptimizationMechanism (MTOM) in addition to SWA |
2 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR029: Move capability assertions (e.g., MustNotSendCancel,MustNotSendRenew, etc.) which are properties of the STS not the token, intoWS-Trust assertion |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR030: Descriptions are inconsistent with the element tagnames (/sp:MustNotSendCancel, /sp:MustNotSendAmend, "/sp:MustNotSendRenew"). |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR031: Inconsistencies with RFC 2119 |
2 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR032: statement that this specification will not furtherdefine the wst:claims element should not be followed by more informationabout it |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR033: plural agreement |
2 |
2007-04-16 |
| Issue PR034: Ambiguous value "sp:RequireAppliesTo" element |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| [internal] RE: Issue PR025: Clarify that consistent versions ofWS-Policy and WS-PolicyAttachment specifications MUST be used |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| [internal] RE: Issue PR029: Move capability assertions (e.g.,MustNotSendCancel, MustNotSendRenew, etc.) which are properties of the STSnot the token, into WS-Trust assertion |
1 |
2007-04-16 |
| Groups - WS-SX Weekly Telecon modified |
2 |
2007-04-17 |
| RE: [ws-sx] Issue PR024: SP document doesn't say how to get a valuefor the wsp: prefix |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| RE: Issue PR026: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy PublicReview document |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| RE: Issue PR027: Editorial comments on WS-SecurityPolicy PublicReview document |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| [ws-sx] RE: Issue PR030: Descriptions are inconsistent with theelement tagnames (/sp:MustNotSendCancel, /sp:MustNotSendAmend,"/sp:MustNotSendRenew"). |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| [ws-sx] RE: Issue PR032: statement that this specification will notfurtherdefine the wst:claims element should not be followed by moreinformationabout it |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| [ws-sx] RE: Issue PR034: Ambiguous value "sp:RequireAppliesTo"element |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| Examples document feedback |
2 |
2007-04-18 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01-diff.pdf (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01-diff.pdf) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01-diff.doc (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01-diff.doc) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01.pdf (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01.pdf) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01.doc (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01.doc) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| SP with 2nd PR issues resolutions applied |
2 |
2007-04-18 |
| WS-SX TC Minutes, April 18 2007 |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| WS-SX TC Minutes, April 18 2007 - version 2 |
1 |
2007-04-18 |
| WS-SX TC Minutes, April 18 2007 - version 3 |
1 |
2007-04-19 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02-diff.pdf (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02-diff.pdf) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-19 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01-diff.doc (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02-diff.doc) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-19 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r01.pdf (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02.pdf) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-19 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02.doc (ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02-r02.doc) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-19 |
| NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts, enforcethe presense of those headers |
1 |
2007-04-20 |
| Re: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts,enforce the presense of those headers |
1 |
2007-04-20 |
| RE: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions inSigned/EncryptedParts, enforce the presense of those headers |
1 |
2007-04-20 |
| Request to start WS-SX ballots |
8 |
2007-04-20 |
| Groups - ws-securitypolicy-1.2.zip (ws-securitypolicy-1.2.zip) uploaded |
1 |
2007-04-20 |
| Ballot(s) reminder |
3 |
2007-04-23 |
| Ballots to Approve WSSecurityPolicy v1.2 as a Committee Specificaton and submit for OS Vote |
1 |
2007-04-28 |
