| 00000 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-01-30 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-01-30.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 10:32 |
| 00001 |
Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-02 12:50 |
| 00002 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 12:58 |
| 00003 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) added |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 13:00 |
| 00004 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 13:01 |
| 00005 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 13:01 |
| 00006 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 13:08 |
| 00007 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-02 14:14 |
| 00008 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-02 14:21 |
| 00009 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-02 14:33 |
| 00010 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-02 14:59 |
| 00011 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated ComponentType - proposal comments |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-02 15:09 |
| 00012 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-02 15:13 |
| 00013 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-02 15:18 |
| 00014 |
[ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - Updated proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-02 15:22 |
| 00015 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-02 15:27 |
| 00016 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments |
Yang Lei
|
2009-02-02 15:32 |
| 00017 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 27 - Security Annotations in generated Component Type -proposal comments |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-02 15:37 |
| 00018 |
RE: [sca-j] Reminder: SCA-J Virtual Face to Face - Feb 2nd, 3rd and 6th |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-02 16:27 |
| 00019 |
Raw chat log from SCA-J virtual F2F session on 02/02/2009 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-02 18:34 |
| 00020 |
NEW ISSUE: Long running request/response operations |
David Booz
|
2009-02-02 18:43 |
| 00021 |
ISSUE 119: COnformance |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-02-02 20:24 |
| 00022 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 10:39 |
| 00023 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 10:40 |
| 00024 |
CD02 Rev1 of Java CAA spec available |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-03 10:46 |
| 00025 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Long running request/response operations |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-03 10:47 |
| 00026 |
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Day 1 - 2009-02-02 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Day 1 - 2009-02-02.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 11:09 |
| 00027 |
JAVA-6: Proposed direction |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 11:30 |
| 00028 |
Which scopes must implementations support? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 13:01 |
| 00029 |
Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy Annotation Material with restof spec |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-03 13:10 |
| 00030 |
RE: [sca-j] Which scopes must implementations support? [JAVA-128] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-03 13:17 |
| 00031 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 13:18 |
| 00032 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 13:36 |
| 00033 |
NEW ISSUE: Which scopes must implementations support? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 13:45 |
| 00034 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Which scopes must implementations support? [JAVA-128] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-03 13:51 |
| 00035 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-03 13:54 |
| 00036 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 14:36 |
| 00037 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-6: Proposed direction |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-03 14:43 |
| 00038 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-6: Proposed direction |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 15:28 |
| 00039 |
[Issue 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - Updated proposal #2 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-03 15:42 |
| 00040 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-03 18:02 |
| 00041 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec |
Yang Lei
|
2009-02-03 18:33 |
| 00042 |
VF2F Day 2 raw chat log, and xml attachement |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-03 18:39 |
| 00043 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27 |
Yang Lei
|
2009-02-03 20:18 |
| 00044 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 20:28 |
| 00045 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-03 22:18 |
| 00046 |
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Days 1 and 2 - 2nd and 3rd February 2009 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - Days 1and 2 - 2009-02-02 and 03.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-04 09:39 |
| 00047 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-05 09:39 |
| 00048 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge Policy AnnotationMaterial with rest of spec -- Issue 27 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-05 09:52 |
| 00049 |
Issue 119: alternate proposal |
Bnish Larmarkar
|
2009-02-06 08:02 |
| 00050 |
JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-06 10:48 |
| 00051 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 12:33 |
| 00052 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 13:21 |
| 00053 |
Proposed resolution for JAVA-6 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-06 13:25 |
| 00054 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf (Virtual Face to Face) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 13:38 |
| 00055 |
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev1+Merge3 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 15:20 |
| 00056 |
Re: [sca-j] Editorial Rework of CD02 Rev1 to Merge PolicyAnnotationMaterial with rest of spec - Version #3 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-06 15:22 |
| 00057 |
Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-06 18:09 |
| 00058 |
[sca-j] Java TC raw minutes Feb 6th 2009 |
Yang Lei
|
2009-02-06 18:15 |
| 00059 |
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 27 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge+Issue27.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 19:14 |
| 00060 |
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 27 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge+Issue27.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 19:18 |
| 00061 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
David Booz
|
2009-02-06 19:21 |
| 00062 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-06 20:43 |
| 00063 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
David Booz
|
2009-02-06 21:03 |
| 00064 |
Groups - SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - February 2009 (SCA Java Virtual Face to Face Minutes - 2009-02-02, 03 and 06.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 22:03 |
| 00065 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-02-07 06:52 |
| 00066 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-08 10:43 |
| 00067 |
Re: [sca-j] Will we be needing another V F2F next week? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-08 15:31 |
| 00068 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 Word Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-08 19:56 |
| 00069 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev1 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-08 19:57 |
| 00070 |
Action Item 2008-11-11-7: Propose a delta on JAVA-25 for message correlation on callbacks |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-09 09:44 |
| 00071 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1 Merge2-1 Issue6_mje.doc (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1 Merge2-1 Issue6_mje.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 10:29 |
| 00072 |
Re: [sca-j] Proposed resolution for JAVA-6 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-09 10:32 |
| 00073 |
JAVA-46: Proposal for ServiceReference equals() method |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-09 11:37 |
| 00074 |
JAVA-125: proposed resolution |
Graham Charters
|
2009-02-09 11:53 |
| 00075 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 12:18 |
| 00076 |
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: alternate proposal |
Cryan Bupperle
|
2009-02-09 13:47 |
| 00077 |
Re: [sca-j] Action Item 2008-11-11-7: Propose a delta on JAVA-25for message correlation on callbacks |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 14:39 |
| 00078 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 14:49 |
| 00079 |
NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 15:07 |
| 00080 |
NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 15:22 |
| 00081 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7 |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-09 15:23 |
| 00082 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-46: Proposal for ServiceReference equals() method |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 15:31 |
| 00083 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 |
Yang Lei
|
2009-02-09 15:38 |
| 00084 |
Re: [sca-j] Issue 119: alternate proposal |
Bnish Larmarkar
|
2009-02-09 15:42 |
| 00085 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with Example 2b in chapter 7 - [JAVA-129] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-09 15:49 |
| 00086 |
ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 |
David Booz
|
2009-02-09 15:56 |
| 00087 |
Raw Text from SCA-J TC conf call, 9th Feb 2009 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-09 17:03 |
| 00088 |
Groups - javacaa-code-draft1.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 23:10 |
| 00089 |
Groups - javacaa-code-draft1.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 23:38 |
| 00090 |
ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-09 23:42 |
| 00091 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution |
Graham Charters
|
2009-02-10 13:06 |
| 00092 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-125: proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-10 14:04 |
| 00093 |
NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-10 15:10 |
| 00094 |
ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-10 15:26 |
| 00095 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-10 15:48 |
| 00097 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-10 15:55 |
| 00096 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-131: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-10 16:10 |
| 00098 |
JAVA-76: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-10 20:43 |
| 00099 |
Groups - javacaa-code-draft2.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 23:51 |
| 00100 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-10 23:55 |
| 00101 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-09 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-09.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 12:05 |
| 00102 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-11 14:59 |
| 00103 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-11 16:04 |
| 00104 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-11 19:26 |
| 00105 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-11 21:32 |
| 00106 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-11 21:32 |
| 00107 |
RE: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-12 09:38 |
| 00108 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 09:52 |
| 00109 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 09:59 |
| 00110 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6-draft2.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 13:14 |
| 00111 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1+Merge2-1+Issue6-draft2.pdf uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 13:16 |
| 00112 |
Re: [sca-j] Proposed resolution for JAVA-6 |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 13:21 |
| 00113 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-12 13:22 |
| 00114 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 14:39 |
| 00115 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:39 |
| 00116 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 14:45 |
| 00117 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 14:50 |
| 00118 |
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 22:43 |
| 00119 |
Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 22:45 |
| 00120 |
Groups - javacaa-code-cd02-rev2.zip uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-12 23:11 |
| 00121 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 121: Work in progress zip file |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 23:20 |
| 00122 |
JAVA-121: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 23:23 |
| 00123 |
RE: [sca-j] Groups - Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-13 09:54 |
| 00124 |
RE: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded |
[ike Fdwards
|
2009-02-13 11:25 |
| 00125 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-13 12:29 |
| 00126 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-13 12:42 |
| 00127 |
RE: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter 7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded |
David Booz
|
2009-02-13 13:04 |
| 00128 |
[ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions - updated proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-13 13:23 |
| 00129 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-13 13:30 |
| 00130 |
Re: [sca-j] Proposal for ISSUE 130: Problems with Example 3 in chapter7 (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2+Issue130.doc) uploaded |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 14:09 |
| 00131 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 14:31 |
| 00132 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 14:39 |
| 00133 |
Minutes 13 Feb 2009 |
Meeraj Kunnumpurath
|
2009-02-13 16:06 |
| 00134 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Jim Marino
|
2009-02-13 16:11 |
| 00135 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-13 17:07 |
| 00136 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 17:47 |
| 00137 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 18:03 |
| 00138 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions- updated proposal |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 18:27 |
| 00139 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-13 20:33 |
| 00140 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-13 20:36 |
| 00141 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-1: Source code for SCAClientFactory proposal - somethoughts |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 23:05 |
| 00142 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-13 23:34 |
| 00143 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Jim Marino
|
2009-02-13 23:46 |
| 00144 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-13 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-13.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-15 21:03 |
| 00145 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-15 21:24 |
| 00146 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-15 21:31 |
| 00147 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-16 12:32 |
| 00148 |
[NEW ISSUE] Specification should require JDK 1.5 or above. |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-16 14:28 |
| 00149 |
RE: [NEW ISSUE] Specification should require JDK 1.5 or above. - [JAVA-132] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-16 14:36 |
| 00150 |
Groups - Issue60 Version g - PDF (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02_issue60g.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 15:31 |
| 00151 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 60] Sharing Java artifacts across contributions -updated proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 15:32 |
| 00152 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Kim [arino
|
2009-02-16 16:37 |
| 00153 |
Raw chat log of 2009-02-16 telcon |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-02-16 17:03 |
| 00154 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-16 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-16.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-17 08:50 |
| 00155 |
ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&I specifications |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-17 09:03 |
| 00156 |
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&Ispecifications |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-17 09:16 |
| 00157 |
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&Ispecifications |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-17 09:23 |
| 00158 |
Re: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAAand C&I specifications |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-17 09:58 |
| 00159 |
RE: [sca-j] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Java CAA and C&I specifications |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-17 11:07 |
| 00160 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-17 13:55 |
| 00161 |
[JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-18 15:50 |
| 00162 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-19 13:17 |
| 00163 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Qaymond Geng
|
2009-02-19 17:13 |
| 00164 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Kim [arino
|
2009-02-19 18:18 |
| 00165 |
LSC Recommendation: Removing the complexity of merging derived component types with sidefiles |
Jeff Mischkinsky
|
2009-02-19 18:57 |
| 00166 |
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-77] - Updated proposal: A remotable service SHOULD be translatable into a generally accepted standard for a service, such as WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-20 11:11 |
| 00167 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-20 11:20 |
| 00168 |
RE: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-20 11:44 |
| 00169 |
[JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
Pavlov, Plamen
|
2009-02-20 11:48 |
| 00170 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-20 13:08 |
| 00171 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-20 13:27 |
| 00172 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-20 13:42 |
| 00173 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
David Booz
|
2009-02-20 14:08 |
| 00174 |
Today's minutes |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-02-20 16:14 |
| 00175 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
Raymond Feng
|
2009-02-20 16:50 |
| 00176 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-19 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-19.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-21 00:08 |
| 00177 |
AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
Barack, Ron
|
2009-02-21 15:03 |
| 00178 |
AW: [LIKELY JUNK]AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
Barack, Ron
|
2009-02-21 23:07 |
| 00179 |
JAVA-13: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-22 09:54 |
| 00180 |
JAVA-17: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-22 10:19 |
| 00181 |
NEW ISSUE: Unannotated properties and references |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-22 10:44 |
| 00182 |
RE: [LIKELY JUNK]AW: [sca-j] [JAVA-2] Determining the data binding to use (e.g. JAXB or SDO) |
"Ravchenko, Uladimir"
|
2009-02-22 16:02 |
| 00183 |
Re: [sca-j] [JAVA-1] Proposed styles of code for the SCAClientFactory |
Jim Marino
|
2009-02-22 20:41 |
| 00184 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Unannotated properties and references - [JAVA-133] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-22 22:39 |
| 00185 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-22 22:59 |
| 00186 |
JAVA-74: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 08:38 |
| 00187 |
JAVA-97: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 08:50 |
| 00188 |
Editorial action needed: incorrect package names |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 08:56 |
| 00189 |
Re: [sca-j] JAVA-17: Proposed resolution |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-23 09:32 |
| 00190 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev1.pdf) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 10:01 |
| 00191 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA CD02 Rev2 PDF Format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 10:02 |
| 00192 |
JAVA-98: Proposed direction for resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 10:33 |
| 00193 |
NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementation classes |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 10:42 |
| 00194 |
NEW ISSUE: Problems with definition of @Service annotation |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 11:33 |
| 00195 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback and @Remotable on implementation classes - [JAVA-134] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-23 13:35 |
| 00196 |
RE: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Problems with definition of @Service annotation - [JAVA-135] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-23 13:35 |
| 00197 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 13:41 |
| 00198 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
David Booz
|
2009-02-23 14:35 |
| 00199 |
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal Word format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 16:24 |
| 00200 |
Groups - Java CAA CD02 Rev3 Proposal PDF format (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-23 16:26 |
| 00201 |
[ISSUE 104] RFC2119 Language is needed for CAA Specification - Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-23 16:31 |
| 00202 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: @Callback injection could be NULL |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-23 16:35 |
| 00203 |
Raw Chat SCA-J TC Feb 23, 2009 |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-02-23 18:10 |
| 00204 |
Review comments on sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev3_proposal.doc |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-23 18:19 |
| 00205 |
Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true for constructor parameter? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-23 18:40 |
| 00206 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Raymond Feng
|
2009-02-23 21:09 |
| 00207 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-24 09:52 |
| 00208 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-24 10:15 |
| 00209 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-23 (SCA Java Minutes 2009-02-23.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 10:30 |
| 00210 |
[NEW ISSUE] Remove the use of componentType side files from the Java C&Ispecification |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-25 10:14 |
| 00211 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-25 10:17 |
| 00212 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-25 10:44 |
| 00213 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-25 11:14 |
| 00214 |
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Remove the use of componentType side files from the Java C&I specification - [JAVA-136] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-25 14:52 |
| 00215 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA Specification CD02 - PDF Version (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 13:23 |
| 00216 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 15:02 |
| 00217 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 15:02 |
| 00218 |
New Java C&I working draft 03 |
David Booz
|
2009-02-26 15:09 |
| 00219 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 16:26 |
| 00220 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 00:54 |
| 00221 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD03 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 00:55 |
| 00222 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-102: Need to have a Name parameter on the @Serviceannotation |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-27 10:23 |
| 00223 |
[NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-27 11:15 |
| 00224 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
David Booz
|
2009-02-27 12:52 |
| 00225 |
[JAVA-1] Updated code proposal |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-27 13:31 |
| 00226 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-27 13:43 |
| 00227 |
RE: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect - [JAVA-137] |
Mark Combellack
|
2009-02-27 13:53 |
| 00228 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 13:55 |
| 00229 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 14:30 |
| 00230 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Work) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 14:33 |
| 00231 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-27 14:35 |
| 00232 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-27 14:37 |
| 00233 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-27 14:43 |
| 00234 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD04 proposal (Word) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc) modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-27 14:44 |
| 00235 |
[ISSUE 105] RFC2119 Language is needed for C&I Specification - PROPOSAL |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-27 14:44 |
| 00236 |
Re: [sca-j] Why is @Property.required attribute MUST be true forconstructor parameter? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-27 14:48 |
| 00237 |
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-27 15:10 |
| 00238 |
Raw chat log from Feb 27 SCA-J call |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-27 16:41 |
| 00239 |
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE] Java C&I Constrctor Examples are incorrect |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-27 16:58 |
| 00240 |
Constructor selected for implementation instance creation |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-27 19:02 |
| 00241 |
Can a reference used with constructor be optional? |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-27 19:05 |
| 00242 |
Some comments on sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd04_proposal.doc |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-27 19:18 |
| 00243 |
Re: [sca-j] Can a reference used with constructor be optional? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-28 13:56 |
