xml-dev

← back

1,483 messages · 285 threads

# Subject From Date
00004 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete David Carlisle 2002-07-31 23:15
00017 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete Richard Tobin 2002-07-31 23:31
00018 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete David Carlisle 2002-07-31 23:34
00008 RE: [xml-dev] External parsed general entities Michael Leditschke 2002-08-01 00:38
00024 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) James Fuller 2002-08-01 02:46
00007 FW: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete Bill de hÓra 2002-08-01 08:07
00009 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) James Fuller 2002-08-01 08:43
00023 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete Alaric B. Snell 2002-08-01 09:10
00020 namespaced attributes, was: URIs, concrete David Carlisle 2002-08-01 09:15
00021 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-01 09:18
00022 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete James Fuller 2002-08-01 09:40
00010 Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Sebastian Rohde 2002-08-01 12:43
00006 RE: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-01 12:53
00011 AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Sebastian Rohde 2002-08-01 12:58
00005 RE: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-01 13:02
00019 RE: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Manos Batsis 2002-08-01 13:03
00012 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the qu estion) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-01 13:08
00001 Trust Hodder, Ed 2002-08-01 13:12
00002 RE: [xml-dev] External parsed general entities G. Ken Holman 2002-08-01 13:20
00003 New URI schemes [was: DNS based URIs that don't...] Norman Gray 2002-08-01 13:25
00000 Re: URIs, concrete Norman Gray 2002-08-01 13:28
00013 RE: [xml-dev] External parsed general entities G. Ken Holman 2002-08-01 13:28
00016 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-01 13:29
00014 AW: [xml-dev] Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing? Sebastian Rohde 2002-08-01 13:32
00015 Re: [xml-dev] Trust Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-01 13:40
00077 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 03:10
00091 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 03:18
00048 RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 03:28
00033 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 03:31
00034 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 03:45
00047 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 03:52
00092 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 04:03
00075 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 04:51
00090 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) bryan 2002-08-02 08:54
00079 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 08:58
00064 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 09:17
00052 wrong Sean was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) bryan 2002-08-02 09:18
00112 RE: [xml-dev] wrong Sean was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) bryan 2002-08-02 09:22
00121 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 09:46
00122 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) James Fuller 2002-08-02 09:59
00054 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) bryan 2002-08-02 10:03
00111 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 10:04
00063 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Norman Gray 2002-08-02 10:07
00050 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Norman Gray 2002-08-02 10:51
00065 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Norman Gray 2002-08-02 11:06
00049 RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Don Box 2002-08-02 11:17
00067 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the John Cowan 2002-08-02 11:30
00123 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Richard Tobin 2002-08-02 12:25
00110 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Norman Gray 2002-08-02 12:33
00109 XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-02 12:37
00124 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-02 13:06
00066 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-02 13:13
00051 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the John Cowan 2002-08-02 13:16
00053 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the John Cowan 2002-08-02 13:18
00080 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-02 13:19
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 13:20
00035 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-02 13:23
00062 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Jeff Rafter 2002-08-02 13:23
00046 CORRECTION to XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-02 13:24
00045 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the David Carlisle 2002-08-02 13:28
00036 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 13:29
00078 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 13:35
00089 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 13:48
00076 RE: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Manos Batsis 2002-08-02 13:50
00093 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Norman Gray 2002-08-02 13:53
00118 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 13:54
00103 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 14:01
00055 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 14:09
00073 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 14:10
00072 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 14:14
00057 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the David Carlisle 2002-08-02 14:17
00101 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 14:21
00119 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes John Cowan 2002-08-02 14:21
00106 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 14:27
00117 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 14:27
00030 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) W. E. Perry 2002-08-02 14:29
00039 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-02 14:30
00095 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 14:37
00087 RES: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Eric Paschoalick Chaves 2002-08-02 14:45
00085 Re: RES: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-02 14:53
00038 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes John Cowan 2002-08-02 14:55
00096 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 14:57
00032 RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-02 15:04
00040 Truncation parsing < Craig H Fry 2002-08-02 15:05
00027 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-02 15:08
00044 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 15:09
00025 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 15:10
00083 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 15:12
00099 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 15:15
00098 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 15:16
00029 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 15:16
00082 Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 15:17
00041 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 15:24
00107 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 15:34
00031 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 15:37
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 15:37
00037 FW: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Doug Rudder 2002-08-02 15:40
00071 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 15:43
00058 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) David Carlisle 2002-08-02 15:48
00061 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 15:50
00068 Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Mike Champion 2002-08-02 15:55
00115 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming David Carlisle 2002-08-02 16:03
00102 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Matt Gushee 2002-08-02 16:03
00105 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Mike Champion 2002-08-02 16:04
00120 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Norman Gray 2002-08-02 16:07
00060 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-02 16:10
00104 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes John Cowan 2002-08-02 16:18
00069 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the David Carlisle 2002-08-02 16:19
00116 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Richard Tobin 2002-08-02 16:20
00108 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Mike Brown 2002-08-02 16:40
00113 RE: [xml-dev] Default namespace (was Re: URIs, concrete (was Re:Un-ask the J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-02 16:40
00070 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Mike Champion 2002-08-02 16:43
00059 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) John Cowan 2002-08-02 17:19
00074 RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Don Box 2002-08-02 17:22
00056 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Tim Bray 2002-08-02 17:22
00100 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 17:37
00081 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 17:37
00028 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 17:41
00042 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Seairth Jacobs 2002-08-02 17:45
00043 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Norman Gray 2002-08-02 17:52
00084 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Mike Champion 2002-08-02 17:53
00026 Re: [xml-dev] Truncation parsing < Mike Brown 2002-08-02 17:54
00097 Re: [xml-dev] Truncation parsing < Aleksander Slominski 2002-08-02 18:01
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Tim Bray 2002-08-02 18:07
00094 Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 18:11
00177 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-02 18:19
00191 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 18:23
00148 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 18:45
00133 Re: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 19:02
00147 Re: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local John Cowan 2002-08-02 19:09
00134 RE: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-02 19:10
00192 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) J.Pietschmann 2002-08-02 19:21
00175 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Joe English 2002-08-02 19:22
00190 Re: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 19:26
00179 RE: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 19:27
00164 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 19:37
00152 Re: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 19:39
00221 Re: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-02 19:45
00212 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 19:47
00222 RE: [xml-dev] Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 19:53
00211 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 19:57
00154 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-02 20:22
00163 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the James Fuller 2002-08-02 20:24
00150 RE: [xml-dev] Order to the madness (Default namespaces are *evil* !) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-02 20:31
00165 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 20:42
00149 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 20:45
00223 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Mike Haarman 2002-08-02 20:50
00167 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 20:52
00210 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 20:54
00209 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Joe English 2002-08-02 21:07
00224 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:15
00151 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup John Cowan 2002-08-02 21:17
00166 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Tim Bray 2002-08-02 21:18
00162 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Joe English 2002-08-02 21:23
00153 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:24
00188 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: U RIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:29
00135 Re: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming John Cowan 2002-08-02 21:30
00180 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:32
00146 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Tim Bray 2002-08-02 21:33
00145 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:37
00136 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:40
00178 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the qu estion) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-02 21:41
00189 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) John Cowan 2002-08-02 21:43
00176 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-02 22:05
00193 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jeff Greif 2002-08-02 22:05
00218 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Tim Bray 2002-08-02 22:06
00203 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 22:07
00155 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-02 22:10
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) John Cowan 2002-08-02 22:22
00172 [ANN]: Software to convert Relational Databases to XML documents Murali Mani 2002-08-02 23:07
00157 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the qu estion) Mike Brown 2002-08-03 00:54
00201 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-03 01:25
00206 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-03 02:14
00219 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-03 02:22
00217 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-03 03:27
00130 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-03 09:49
00139 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (wasRE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 12:46
00195 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 12:48
00187 constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-03 12:58
00185 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 13:01
00196 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-03 13:25
00138 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 14:23
00132 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 14:39
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-03 14:49
00127 A good joke... Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 14:49
00144 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Mike Brown 2002-08-03 15:25
00125 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Mike Champion 2002-08-03 15:58
00183 relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Glen Mazza 2002-08-03 16:01
00198 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Richard Tobin 2002-08-03 16:11
00199 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-03 16:12
00182 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Richard Tobin 2002-08-03 16:14
00129 Re: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Richard Tobin 2002-08-03 16:19
00141 Escaping URLs and URIs into valid xml names Jimmy Cerra 2002-08-03 16:32
00131 Mail censorship Richard Tobin 2002-08-03 16:39
00137 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Jimmy Cerra 2002-08-03 16:54
00207 Re: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-03 17:02
00214 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 17:19
00171 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-03 17:28
00158 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-03 17:38
00161 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-03 17:43
00168 Re: RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Mike Champion 2002-08-03 17:50
00215 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-03 18:13
00205 Re: [xml-dev] Escaping URLs and URIs into valid xml names Rich Salz 2002-08-03 18:29
00220 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Mike Brown 2002-08-03 18:29
00202 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-03 19:30
00160 RE: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Michael Kay 2002-08-03 19:38
00169 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-03 21:00
00216 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" John Cowan 2002-08-03 21:12
00208 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-03 23:41
00204 RE: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Jimmy Cerra 2002-08-03 23:47
00213 Re: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 00:38
00170 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 02:22
00159 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 02:27
00174 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Julian Reschke 2002-08-04 09:25
00156 RE: RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 12:16
00200 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 12:19
00181 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 12:39
00128 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 13:05
00142 browsers that support XSL sandr8 2002-08-04 13:12
00143 Better understand the state of the art Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 13:29
00126 Re: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 13:40
00184 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 14:05
00197 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-04 14:47
00186 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-04 14:53
00194 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 15:59
00277 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 15:59
00291 RE: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL Manos Batsis 2002-08-04 16:02
00248 RE: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL sandr8 2002-08-04 16:06
00233 maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 16:43
00234 Re: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 16:59
00247 Re: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 17:02
00292 Re: [xml-dev] maps Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 17:07
00275 Re: [xml-dev] maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 17:12
00290 Re: [xml-dev] maps J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-04 17:14
00279 [OT] Mozilla (Was Re: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL) sandr8 2002-08-04 17:18
00264 URI: New Interpretation J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-04 17:23
00252 Re: [xml-dev] maps Jeff Rafter 2002-08-04 17:43
00312 Re: [xml-dev] maps Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-04 17:55
00321 RE: [xml-dev] maps Bill de hÓra 2002-08-04 18:24
00322 Merge docs s raju 2002-08-04 18:55
00311 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-04 19:47
00254 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 20:01
00263 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 20:01
00250 RE: [xml-dev] maps Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-04 20:04
00265 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-04 20:14
00249 Re: maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 20:50
00280 RE: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-04 20:59
00235 Re: [xml-dev] XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang="" Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-04 21:08
00267 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 21:16
00323 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 21:29
00310 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Joshua Allen 2002-08-04 21:54
00309 RE: [xml-dev] maps J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-04 21:55
00324 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-04 22:00
00266 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-04 22:13
00253 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-04 22:48
00251 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 22:54
00262 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-04 22:57
00288 Re: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the John Cowan 2002-08-05 00:45
00246 RE: [xml-dev] maps Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-05 00:49
00245 Re: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Jeff Rafter 2002-08-05 01:39
00236 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-05 02:03
00278 Re: [xml-dev] maps John Cowan 2002-08-05 02:08
00289 Re: [xml-dev] maps John Cowan 2002-08-05 02:49
00276 Re: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Tim Bray 2002-08-05 02:53
00293 Re: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) John Cowan 2002-08-05 03:32
00318 Re: [xml-dev] maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 04:00
00303 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 04:08
00255 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-05 04:33
00273 RE: [xml-dev] Re: maps Micah Dubinko 2002-08-05 04:34
00272 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 04:42
00257 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 04:47
00301 Re: [xml-dev] Truncation parsing < Eric Bohlman 2002-08-05 06:12
00319 Re: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-05 06:26
00306 RE: [xml-dev] relying on ordering of sibling XML elements Glen Mazza 2002-08-05 06:33
00317 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the Julian Reschke 2002-08-05 07:35
00230 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Michael Kay 2002-08-05 07:48
00239 Re: [xml-dev] Global/Local attributes David Carlisle 2002-08-05 08:42
00295 Re: [xml-dev] browsers that support XSL David Carlisle 2002-08-05 09:16
00287 RE: [xml-dev] Re: maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-05 12:04
00283 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-05 12:27
00285 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 12:34
00296 Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-05 12:38
00238 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 12:57
00232 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Mike Champion 2002-08-05 13:05
00240 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 13:19
00227 REMINDER: EEXTT @ VLDB in Hong Kong akmal @ city 2002-08-05 13:33
00244 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the qu estion) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 13:40
00225 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 13:54
00298 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-05 14:47
00299 Re: maps John Cowan 2002-08-05 15:14
00282 RE: [xml-dev] Re: maps Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 15:35
00229 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Mike Haarman 2002-08-05 15:37
00241 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 15:38
00237 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-05 15:45
00231 flashback to 1997 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-05 15:46
00307 Re: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Miles Sabin 2002-08-05 15:50
00314 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspectiv e not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 15:54
00271 RE: [xml-dev] Keeping ISO 8879 Alive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup pe rspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 16:26
00258 RE: [xml-dev] maps Bill de hÓra 2002-08-05 16:42
00261 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Bill de hÓra 2002-08-05 16:42
00268 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 16:45
00315 [announce] Lucid XML Server Publisher 1.0b1 released Announce @ Lucid'i.t. 2002-08-05 16:51
00305 RE: [xml-dev] maps Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 17:25
00320 RE: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 17:30
00302 RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: [xml-dev] Un-ask the question) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-05 18:02
00260 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 18:14
00269 XML APIs - What's next? Mike Champion 2002-08-05 18:19
00316 RE: [xml-dev] constructive (was RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspectiv e not code) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-05 18:32
00304 RE: [xml-dev] XML APIs - What's next? Bill de hÓra 2002-08-05 18:51
00308 RE: [xml-dev] XML APIs - What's next? Manos Batsis 2002-08-05 19:08
00313 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 19:28
00270 Quick, Easy Namespace Question CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-05 19:33
00259 Re: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-05 19:37
00274 RE: [xml-dev] Quick, Easy Namespace Question Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-05 19:45
00256 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Quick, Easy Namespace Question CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-05 20:28
00300 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Quick, Easy Namespace Question Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-05 20:38
00281 Reality check needed .... Mike Champion 2002-08-05 20:44
00228 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-05 20:55
00242 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Quick, Easy Namespace Question Jeff Rafter 2002-08-05 21:00
00243 CDATA strangeness Ramin Firoozye 2002-08-05 21:45
00377 Re: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-05 21:55
00226 Re: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness John Cowan 2002-08-05 21:59
00284 Re: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Richard Tobin 2002-08-05 22:04
00297 Re: XMLSchema.dtd not fully defined? Richard Tobin 2002-08-05 22:14
00286 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Mike Champion 2002-08-05 23:26
00294 RE: [xml-dev] Please no UOM (was Re: maps) Joshua Allen 2002-08-05 23:49
00391 Re: [xml-dev] flashback to 1997 Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-06 03:20
00333 RE: [xml-dev] Current Status of Web Services Transaction? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-06 03:53
00334 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 04:42
00347 RE: [xml-dev] Current Status of Web Services Transaction? Paul Brown 2002-08-06 05:38
00392 Re: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness William F. Gilreath 2002-08-06 06:52
00390 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-06 08:06
00379 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Michael Kay 2002-08-06 09:03
00364 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 12:08
00352 OASIS TC Call For Participation: UDDI Specification TC Karl F. Best 2002-08-06 12:19
00412 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 12:45
00422 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 13:46
00421 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-06 13:48
00411 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-06 14:05
00354 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 14:12
00363 XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-06 14:14
00350 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 14:16
00365 [xml-dev] using avt's outside xslt Wannheden, Knut 2002-08-06 14:33
00423 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 14:36
00349 markup anti-pattern Mike Haarman 2002-08-06 14:43
00410 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 14:44
00367 Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Mike Champion 2002-08-06 14:45
00424 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps John Cowan 2002-08-06 15:26
00409 Re: maps Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2002-08-06 15:28
00366 XML stylesheet web service Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-06 15:41
00351 RE: maps Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-06 15:42
00362 DOM L3 views.idl question Jeff Rafter 2002-08-06 15:47
00353 Re: [xml-dev] RE: maps John Cowan 2002-08-06 15:48
00388 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 15:57
00336 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 16:00
00345 W3C XFrames - first public WD published Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-06 16:07
00335 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 16:07
00346 Re: [xml-dev] DOM L3 views.idl question Jeff Rafter 2002-08-06 16:10
00380 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-06 16:11
00378 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-06 16:20
00389 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 16:22
00376 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 16:26
00393 Re: [xml-dev] DOM L3 views.idl question Mike Champion 2002-08-06 16:33
00418 RE: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Ramin Firoozye 2002-08-06 16:44
00403 Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Masayasu Ishikawa 2002-08-06 16:47
00355 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 16:50
00373 RE: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-06 16:50
00372 OASIS announcement of e-Gov discussion list Karl F. Best 2002-08-06 16:56
00357 Re: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Tim Bray 2002-08-06 17:06
00401 Re: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Mike Champion 2002-08-06 17:29
00419 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 17:44
00387 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 18:06
00406 Re: [xml-dev] RE: maps Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 18:12
00417 Word and XML was RE: [xml-dev] XML APIs - What's next? Hodder, Ed 2002-08-06 18:15
00339 Dynamic validation Naren Koka 2002-08-06 18:17
00330 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 18:17
00395 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 18:21
00385 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Ann Navarro 2002-08-06 18:27
00396 RE: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Ramin Firoozye 2002-08-06 18:38
00338 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 18:41
00325 RE: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 18:42
00332 Re: Word and XML was RE: [xml-dev] XML APIs - What's next? Mike Champion 2002-08-06 18:43
00383 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 18:46
00348 Current Status of Web Services Transaction? Eric Lo 2002-08-06 18:49
00340 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 18:50
00327 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps John Cowan 2002-08-06 19:08
00398 RE: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-06 19:14
00344 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 19:16
00399 Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] CDATA strangeness Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-06 19:17
00382 Re: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-06 19:22
00329 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps Bob Hutchison 2002-08-06 19:26
00331 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 19:38
00341 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 19:46
00337 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 20:00
00407 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 20:48
00414 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Joe English 2002-08-06 21:07
00371 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-06 21:13
00358 Deterministic content models??? Andrew Dubinsky 2002-08-06 21:19
00361 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Richard Tobin 2002-08-06 22:07
00375 Re: [xml-dev] Current Status of Web Services Transaction? Eric Lo 2002-08-06 22:12
00368 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? John Evdemon 2002-08-06 22:15
00415 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Joe English 2002-08-06 22:33
00405 XSL Transform special character into <break> Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-06 22:50
00420 Re: [xml-dev] XSL Transform special character into <break> Mike Brown 2002-08-06 22:57
00402 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Jeff Lowery 2002-08-06 23:19
00360 RE: [xml-dev] XSL Transform special character into <break> Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-06 23:29
00369 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value Eddie Robertsson 2002-08-07 00:35
00416 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-07 01:04
00404 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-07 01:38
00408 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-07 02:01
00413 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-07 02:46
00370 Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-07 03:02
00359 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-07 04:56
00374 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-07 06:22
00343 RE: [xml-dev] Markup perspective not code (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: URIs, concrete) Sean McGrath 2002-08-07 08:11
00356 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Bill de hÓra 2002-08-07 08:27
00400 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Robin LaFontaine 2002-08-07 08:42
00381 RE: [xml-dev] XSL Transform special character into <break> Michael Kay 2002-08-07 09:03
00328 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value Michael Kay 2002-08-07 09:06
00342 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Michael Kay 2002-08-07 09:13
00384 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Jonathan Borden 2002-08-07 09:44
00326 What will happen to DOCTYPE? Gustaf Liljegren 2002-08-07 09:46
00397 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Mark Seaborne 2002-08-07 11:03
00386 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... John Cowan 2002-08-07 12:16
00394 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-07 12:49
00477 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Ann Navarro 2002-08-07 13:05
00491 Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Ann Navarro 2002-08-07 13:07
00448 Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-07 13:19
00475 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Andrew Dubinsky 2002-08-07 13:33
00433 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Mike Champion 2002-08-07 13:40
00434 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Bill de hÓra 2002-08-07 13:42
00447 Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-07 13:52
00492 RE: [xml-dev] using avt's outside xslt Ramin Firoozye 2002-08-07 13:53
00490 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Miles Sabin 2002-08-07 14:00
00464 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Alaric B. Snell 2002-08-07 14:09
00452 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... John Cowan 2002-08-07 14:17
00511 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Andrew Dubinsky 2002-08-07 14:31
00512 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Michael Kay 2002-08-07 14:34
00521 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Miles Sabin 2002-08-07 14:43
00522 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-07 14:52
00454 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Doug Rudder 2002-08-07 15:04
00463 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? McNally, David 2002-08-07 15:07
00450 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-07 15:14
00465 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Joe English 2002-08-07 15:21
00449 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? John Cowan 2002-08-07 15:25
00467 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... John Cowan 2002-08-07 15:26
00523 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? John Cowan 2002-08-07 15:29
00510 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-07 15:36
00509 RE: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Doug Rudder 2002-08-07 15:54
00476 Slides: Out-of-line markup Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-07 16:00
00524 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? John Cowan 2002-08-07 16:01
00466 Re: [xml-dev] Deterministic content models??? Richard Tobin 2002-08-07 16:12
00451 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value Richard Tobin 2002-08-07 16:18
00462 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Mike Champion 2002-08-07 16:21
00453 Re: [xml-dev] Tags and Types (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-07 16:28
00488 Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 17:06
00480 RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL James Fuller 2002-08-07 17:10
00435 RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 17:13
00445 xml-dev topic schedule Jeff Lowery 2002-08-07 17:13
00446 RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 17:15
00436 RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL James Fuller 2002-08-07 17:21
00478 another naieve question - valid characters for ID values Rick Jones 2002-08-07 17:42
00489 RE: [xml-dev] another naieve question - valid characters for ID values Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-07 17:47
00493 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-07 17:54
00518 Re: [xml-dev] another naieve question - valid characters for ID values Tim Bray 2002-08-07 17:58
00479 ANN: eXist 0.8 Wolfgang Meier 2002-08-07 18:01
00503 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Mike Champion 2002-08-07 18:31
00455 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL James Fuller 2002-08-07 18:36
00473 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... [email protected] 2002-08-07 18:39
00472 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 18:48
00457 Re: [xml-dev] another naieve question - valid characters for ID values John Cowan 2002-08-07 18:52
00501 ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? Mike Champion 2002-08-07 19:28
00519 Cover Pages Update Karl F. Best 2002-08-07 19:32
00506 RE: ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? Karl F. Best 2002-08-07 19:33
00517 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Micah Dubinko 2002-08-07 19:54
00430 Re: [xml-dev] another naieve question - valid characters for ID values Joe English 2002-08-07 20:06
00439 RE: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Jeff Lowery 2002-08-07 20:17
00495 Re: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Vasil I. Yaroshevich 2002-08-07 20:42
00487 RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 21:13
00485 Re[2]: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL Vasil I. Yaroshevich 2002-08-07 21:26
00496 Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 22:46
00438 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema - Enumerated List to Allow Blank Value Eddie Robertsson 2002-08-07 23:39
00432 RE: [xml-dev] Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-07 23:59
00440 Re: [xml-dev] Overwhelmed with Treeview + / - Jeff Rafter 2002-08-08 02:09
00427 Re: [xml-dev] another naieve question - valid characters for ID values Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-08 05:12
00444 [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Wannheden, Knut 2002-08-08 09:32
00425 RE: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath James Fuller 2002-08-08 09:39
00483 RE: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Michael Kay 2002-08-08 09:55
00498 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published bryan 2002-08-08 10:03
00431 Re: [xml-dev] ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? Jeffrey Lomas 2002-08-08 10:11
00499 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Mark Seaborne 2002-08-08 10:23
00482 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Tree View + / - Lists with XSL bryan 2002-08-08 10:35
00429 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published Ann Navarro 2002-08-08 13:18
00514 agreements vs. Hobbes Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-08 13:21
00441 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published bryan 2002-08-08 13:47
00437 What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-08 14:16
00507 Re: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Juan Estevan Madrigal 2002-08-08 14:30
00471 process vs. "it is" Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-08 14:47
00458 RE: [xml-dev] agreements vs. Hobbes Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-08 14:54
00461 RE: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-08 14:57
00468 RE: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Wannheden, Knut 2002-08-08 15:11
00515 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-08 15:22
00505 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Jim Ancona 2002-08-08 16:10
00520 IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-08 17:08
00502 Re: [xml-dev] IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-08 18:02
00460 code challenge Danny Ayers 2002-08-08 22:37
00469 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Jeff Lowery 2002-08-09 00:30
00516 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-09 00:44
00504 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Toivo "Deutsch" Lainevool 2002-08-09 00:58
00508 Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? Mike Champion 2002-08-09 01:20
00513 XML Core WG would appreciate test cases for XInclude John Cowan 2002-08-09 02:40
00470 Re: [xml-dev] IE6, XSL and The Web (was: RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains) George Cristian Bina 2002-08-09 06:57
00459 Re: [xml-dev] code challenge Morten Primdahl 2002-08-09 07:49
00474 Re: [xml-dev] Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? Francis Norton 2002-08-09 08:45
00456 FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Bill de hÓra 2002-08-09 09:24
00500 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Danny Ayers 2002-08-09 09:29
00481 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Danny Ayers 2002-08-09 09:29
00428 XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-09 09:52
00442 RE: [xml-dev] Iceberg development (was Re: [xml-dev] maps) Mark Seaborne 2002-08-09 09:53
00443 Multidimensional XML Kakade Mangesh 2002-08-09 10:24
00426 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML James Fuller 2002-08-09 10:35
00484 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML bryan 2002-08-09 10:37
00497 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML Kakade Mangesh 2002-08-09 11:30
00486 About XSLT and the recent mail to me Murali Mani 2002-08-09 12:37
00494 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-09 13:20
00591 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML bryan 2002-08-09 13:46
00577 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Jeff Rafter 2002-08-09 13:47
00548 RE: [xml-dev] Multidimensional XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-09 14:00
00547 Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Niklas Gustavsson 2002-08-09 14:25
00533 W3C Standards and Vendor Support CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-09 14:32
00534 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Paul Brown 2002-08-09 14:39
00592 RE: XPointer architecture (Re: [xml-dev] XPointer and XML Schema) Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-09 16:35
00575 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-09 16:37
00590 XLink and Hobbes (was Re: [xml-dev] agreements vs. Hobbes) Mike Champion 2002-08-09 16:56
00579 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Micah Dubinko 2002-08-09 18:17
00564 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-09 19:10
00552 Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Masayasu Ishikawa 2002-08-09 19:13
00612 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? John Cowan 2002-08-09 19:21
00621 RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Jeff Lowery 2002-08-09 19:50
00622 RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-09 19:58
00611 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Standards and Vendor Support Danny Ayers 2002-08-09 20:06
00554 RE: [xml-dev] Is it time for the 80/20 thread yet? Jeff Lowery 2002-08-09 20:21
00563 RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Mike Haarman 2002-08-09 20:30
00550 RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-09 20:37
00565 Re: RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Mike Champion 2002-08-09 21:02
00549 RE: RE: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 Aug ust 2002 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-09 21:04
00567 writing DOM contents to a File or String? Dean James Greenwood 2002-08-09 21:27
00623 actually Dean James Greenwood 2002-08-09 21:34
00610 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Micah Dubinko 2002-08-09 22:44
00609 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Tim Bray 2002-08-09 23:43
00624 Re: [xml-dev] FYI: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra, 11 May 1930 -- 6 August 2002 Jim Keohane 2002-08-09 23:54
00566 Upload Carriage returns Form Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-09 23:58
00562 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Micah Dubinko 2002-08-10 02:36
00553 Re: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 02:52
00588 Re: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 02:56
00580 Re: [xml-dev] ADMINISTRIVIA: list server / archive problems? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 03:02
00535 Re: [xml-dev] agreements vs. Hobbes Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 04:00
00551 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Ann Navarro 2002-08-10 04:16
00546 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 05:26
00545 RE: [xml-dev] code challenge Danny Ayers 2002-08-10 07:26
00536 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-10 07:38
00578 RE: [xml-dev] matching text with regexp in xpath Danny Ayers 2002-08-10 10:06
00589 XLink olden days Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-10 12:00
00576 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-10 12:31
00593 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 17:13
00618 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-10 17:30
00603 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-10 21:18
00555 quarantining namespaces Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-10 21:43
00573 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Masayasu Ishikawa 2002-08-10 21:55
00572 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-10 21:58
00557 how to se the transformed output... sandr8 2002-08-10 22:15
00601 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days John Cowan 2002-08-11 01:46
00619 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-11 01:58
00606 Comparable considered necessary Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-11 02:23
00617 Re: [xml-dev] how to se the transformed output... Bjoern Hoehrmann 2002-08-11 02:48
00530 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-11 02:51
00595 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-11 04:17
00539 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-11 04:22
00587 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-11 07:35
00585 XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. [email protected] 2002-08-11 08:09
00596 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Danny Ayers 2002-08-11 10:27
00538 RE: [xml-dev] XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. bryan 2002-08-11 11:30
00532 Re: [xml-dev] Re: maps [email protected] 2002-08-11 11:57
00540 Re: [xml-dev] how to se the transformed output... sandr8 2002-08-11 12:08
00527 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Paul Prescod 2002-08-11 12:26
00544 Re: [xml-dev] how to se the transformed output... sandr8 2002-08-11 12:31
00525 Re: [xml-dev] XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-11 13:46
00583 Re: [xml-dev] XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-11 13:49
00598 Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Joe English 2002-08-11 15:42
00599 how would one define credible linking? Devon Y. 2002-08-11 15:52
00582 Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-11 16:51
00529 Complex or Simple content usage Danny Vint 2002-08-11 17:06
00541 Re: [xml-dev] XML "needs" a credible linking specification? Discuss. Jonathan Robie 2002-08-11 17:52
00531 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Tim Bray 2002-08-11 18:04
00537 Re: Complex or Simple content usage Jeni Tennison 2002-08-11 18:05
00607 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-11 19:11
00614 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Paul Brown 2002-08-11 20:51
00571 RE: [xml-dev] Programming for Markup vs. Markup for Programming Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-11 21:29
00558 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-12 03:27
00561 Re: [xml-dev] how would one define credible linking? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-12 03:35
00568 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-12 04:39
00615 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-12 04:46
00605 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Ben Trafford 2002-08-12 04:56
00620 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Tim Bray 2002-08-12 05:37
00602 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Manos Batsis 2002-08-12 07:33
00560 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-12 07:40
00569 XLink 2.0 Requirements Micah Dubinko 2002-08-12 07:47
00616 RE: [xml-dev] how would one define credible linking? bryan 2002-08-12 08:00
00604 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Manos Batsis 2002-08-12 08:04
00608 rng 2 xmi Bill de hÓra 2002-08-12 08:10
00613 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-12 08:20
00559 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Bill de hÓra 2002-08-12 08:41
00570 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Manos Batsis 2002-08-12 08:43
00574 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-12 08:49
00556 RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Manos Batsis 2002-08-12 09:05
00600 RE: [xml-dev] rng 2 xmi bryan 2002-08-12 09:11
00581 Re: [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces Robin Berjon 2002-08-12 10:57
00528 Re: [xml-dev] XLink 2.0 Requirements Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-12 11:38
00542 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-12 12:07
00543 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-12 12:17
00584 Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary John Cowan 2002-08-12 12:28
00526 Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-12 12:28
00597 Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-12 12:36
00586 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Ann Navarro 2002-08-12 12:45
00594 Re: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary John Cowan 2002-08-12 12:47
00677 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-13 15:12
00691 Semantic Web Maintenance (WAS RE: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-13 15:33
00648 Re: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs Mark Baker 2002-08-13 15:35
00633 W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis Bob DuCharme 2002-08-13 15:43
00634 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-13 15:48
00647 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema profiling and risk analysis Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-13 16:11
00654 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-13 16:21
00692 Transform XML and Stylesheets Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-13 16:24
00690 RE: [xml-dev] Transform XML and Stylesheets Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-13 16:39
00679 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Norman Walsh 2002-08-13 16:47
00664 XLink and XML specs (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?) Mike Champion 2002-08-13 16:48
00652 Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-13 17:24
00675 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Tim Bray 2002-08-13 17:34
00721 RE: [xml-dev] Types (again) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-13 17:36
00712 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-13 17:36
00722 Re: [xml-dev] Formulae and Patterns (again) (Was: Types (again)) Mike Haarman 2002-08-13 17:42
00711 RE: [xml-dev] Types (again) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-13 17:48
00663 RE: [xml-dev] Types (again) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-13 18:01
00650 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-13 18:02
00665 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-13 18:19
00649 Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-13 18:29
00667 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Mike Champion 2002-08-13 18:55
00723 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-13 18:57
00710 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-13 18:58
00709 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-13 19:31
00724 RE: [xml-dev] Mapping URLs to Qnames to Schema types Manos Batsis 2002-08-13 19:48
00666 CfP: Open Source implementation of JAXB Jochen Wiedmann 2002-08-13 20:09
00651 TAG posts draft web architecture doc for review Mike Champion 2002-08-14 00:02
00662 Java SAX Speed (Was: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) Jochen Wiedmann 2002-08-14 06:45
00653 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-14 07:05
00688 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Leigh Dodds 2002-08-14 12:54
00680 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-14 13:04
00635 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-14 13:30
00646 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Leigh Dodds 2002-08-14 14:17
00645 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-14 14:24
00636 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Mike Champion 2002-08-14 14:48
00678 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-14 15:13
00689 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-14 15:36
00676 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Bob Hutchison 2002-08-14 15:39
00693 RE: RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Bill de hÓra 2002-08-14 15:41
00718 Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) Mike Champion 2002-08-14 15:57
00703 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? John Cowan 2002-08-14 16:01
00655 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-14 16:04
00673 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-14 16:27
00657 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? John Cowan 2002-08-14 16:33
00672 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Jim Ancona 2002-08-14 16:34
00701 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Jim Ancona 2002-08-14 16:43
00719 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Francis Norton 2002-08-14 17:07
00706 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? [email protected] 2002-08-14 17:41
00717 RE: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-14 18:06
00630 Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-14 18:06
00639 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-14 18:13
00695 Re: [xml-dev] Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) Bob Hutchison 2002-08-14 18:21
00687 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Tim Bray 2002-08-14 18:26
00685 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-14 18:33
00696 SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-14 19:17
00638 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Wayne Steele 2002-08-14 19:23
00632 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Mike Champion 2002-08-14 19:28
00627 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-14 19:32
00640 RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-14 19:33
00644 Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-14 19:36
00625 RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-14 19:46
00698 Re: [xml-dev] Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-14 19:49
00699 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-14 19:50
00683 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Mike Champion 2002-08-14 19:50
00682 Re: [xml-dev] Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-14 20:01
00629 Re: [xml-dev] Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-14 20:11
00641 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Joe English 2002-08-14 21:24
00631 RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-14 22:22
00637 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-14 23:07
00707 RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Jeff Lowery 2002-08-14 23:14
00714 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Wayne Steele 2002-08-15 00:40
00671 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 02:16
00658 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Joshua Allen 2002-08-15 02:46
00661 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-15 04:17
00668 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-15 04:35
00715 RE: [xml-dev] Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?) bryan 2002-08-15 08:50
00705 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains bryan 2002-08-15 09:08
00720 Re: [xml-dev] Pushing SAX events out onto the Web? Sean McGrath 2002-08-15 09:15
00702 WSFL Question CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-15 12:24
00660 Re: [xml-dev] WSFL Question bob mcwhirter 2002-08-15 12:34
00669 RE: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) Manos Batsis 2002-08-15 12:41
00716 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-15 12:52
00704 Re: [xml-dev] WSFL Question Mike Champion 2002-08-15 12:52
00708 file system or http Falls, Travis D (CASD, IT) 2002-08-15 13:35
00713 XML 2002 announces keynotes and early registration discount..save over $300.00 now Elledge, Marion 2002-08-15 14:07
00670 XML Schema for large database Bill Riegel 2002-08-15 14:17
00674 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-15 14:39
00656 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 14:52
00700 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-15 14:56
00681 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 15:03
00628 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Julian Reschke 2002-08-15 15:11
00642 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-15 15:13
00643 XMLHTTP Posts and performance Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-15 15:17
00626 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 15:21
00659 Re: [xml-dev] file system or http Kal Ahmed 2002-08-15 15:22
00684 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 15:38
00697 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-15 15:48
00686 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains [email protected] 2002-08-15 15:52
00694 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-15 16:08
00777 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Joshua Allen 2002-08-15 16:30
00791 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Jim Ancona 2002-08-15 16:37
00748 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Didier PH Martin 2002-08-15 16:55
00733 XML is not being Validated against schema...? SISCO 2002-08-15 16:58
00734 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-15 16:59
00747 RE: [xml-dev] XML is not being Validated against schema...? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-15 17:01
00792 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Didier PH Martin 2002-08-15 17:07
00775 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 17:12
00790 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-15 17:16
00779 RE: [xml-dev] XML is not being Validated against schema...? Steven Livingstone 2002-08-15 17:16
00764 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-15 17:22
00752 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Tim Bray 2002-08-15 17:23
00812 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database Jeff Lowery 2002-08-15 17:25
00821 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 17:35
00822 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database Jeff Lowery 2002-08-15 17:36
00811 Re: [xml-dev] SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-15 18:02
00754 Re: SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed) John Cowan 2002-08-15 18:05
00763 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database Bill Riegel 2002-08-15 18:20
00750 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Paul Prescod 2002-08-15 18:40
00765 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema for large database Jeff Lowery 2002-08-15 18:47
00749 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 18:48
00767 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Paul Prescod 2002-08-15 18:54
00823 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Shane McCarron 2002-08-15 19:03
00810 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 19:06
00809 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 19:12
00824 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 19:17
00766 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 19:19
00751 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 19:25
00762 Gah Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 19:30
00753 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 19:33
00788 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-15 19:49
00780 CSS processing (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 20:04
00735 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 20:17
00746 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-15 20:19
00745 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Tim Bray 2002-08-15 20:22
00736 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-15 20:26
00778 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? J. David Eisenberg 2002-08-15 20:27
00789 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-15 20:37
00776 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 21:37
00793 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 21:45
00818 Re: [xml-dev] XLink 2.0 Requirements Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-15 21:51
00803 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Tim Bray 2002-08-15 23:41
00755 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 00:04
00773 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Bill de hÓra 2002-08-16 07:04
00772 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains Steven Livingstone 2002-08-16 08:19
00757 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Robin Berjon 2002-08-16 09:03
00801 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Robin Berjon 2002-08-16 09:11
00819 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Robin Berjon 2002-08-16 09:30
00806 RE: [xml-dev] What the .... ? Referencing XSL stylesheets across domains bryan 2002-08-16 12:01
00817 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-16 13:25
00730 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 13:41
00739 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-16 13:55
00795 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Norman Walsh 2002-08-16 13:56
00787 XML, hypertext Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 14:14
00796 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Bob DuCharme 2002-08-16 14:23
00785 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 14:32
00738 Hypertext and complexity (was RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext) Mike Champion 2002-08-16 14:50
00740 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-16 15:29
00732 Re: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bob DuCharme 2002-08-16 15:41
00727 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-16 15:46
00744 WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 16:10
00725 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 16:17
00783 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:17
00798 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:18
00799 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 16:19
00782 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:20
00737 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:21
00729 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 16:21
00741 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 16:21
00771 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? John Cowan 2002-08-16 16:23
00731 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:24
00814 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? John Cowan 2002-08-16 16:27
00807 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Francis Norton 2002-08-16 16:28
00758 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 16:31
00761 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 16:33
00815 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Jack Park 2002-08-16 16:35
00768 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Tim Bray 2002-08-16 16:35
00805 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:39
00820 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:41
00760 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:42
00802 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:43
00769 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 16:48
00804 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 16:54
00816 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 16:54
00756 (Fwd) Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Matt Gushee 2002-08-16 16:55
00808 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 16:56
00813 Re: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:56
00770 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 16:58
00759 XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 17:00
00774 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 17:01
00800 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 17:12
00781 XML-Schema Help Dave Yancey 2002-08-16 17:12
00728 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 17:13
00742 RE: [xml-dev] XMLHTTP Posts and performance McNally, David 2002-08-16 17:19
00743 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 17:20
00726 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 17:27
00784 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Bryce K. Nielsen 2002-08-16 17:29
00797 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 17:32
00786 RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 17:33
00794 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 17:36
00848 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Bryce K. Nielsen 2002-08-16 17:38
00877 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 17:39
00891 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-16 17:40
00834 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Bryce K. Nielsen 2002-08-16 17:40
00833 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 17:42
00847 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 17:44
00892 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 17:47
00875 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 17:57
00890 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Jeni Tennison 2002-08-16 17:58
00864 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Matt Gushee 2002-08-16 17:59
00879 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 18:04
00852 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Dave Yancey 2002-08-16 18:06
00912 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? John Cowan 2002-08-16 18:12
00921 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-16 18:17
00911 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? John Cowan 2002-08-16 18:21
00922 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bob DuCharme 2002-08-16 18:21
00854 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? John Cowan 2002-08-16 18:23
00863 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 18:26
00850 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 18:32
00865 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Dave Yancey 2002-08-16 18:37
00849 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-16 18:38
00867 RE: [xml-dev] Hypertext and complexity (was RE: [xml-dev] XML, hy pertext) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 18:39
00923 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 18:48
00909 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 18:53
00910 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 18:53
00924 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 19:01
00851 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-16 19:07
00866 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 19:07
00862 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? [email protected] 2002-08-16 19:13
00853 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Paul Spencer 2002-08-16 19:22
00888 XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?) [email protected] 2002-08-16 19:28
00880 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-16 19:28
00835 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-16 19:34
00846 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-16 20:01
00845 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Ranjeet Sonone 2002-08-16 20:04
00836 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Dave Yancey 2002-08-16 20:11
00878 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 20:17
00889 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Priscilla Walmsley 2002-08-16 20:18
00876 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 20:31
00893 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Ranjeet Sonone 2002-08-16 20:34
00903 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Priscilla Walmsley 2002-08-16 20:37
00918 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Doug Rudder 2002-08-16 20:42
00855 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help John Cowan 2002-08-16 20:51
00873 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Jonathan Robie 2002-08-16 20:54
00872 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-16 20:55
00857 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-16 20:59
00901 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Ranjeet Sonone 2002-08-16 21:01
00919 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 21:02
00906 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-16 21:07
00917 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help John Cowan 2002-08-16 21:07
00830 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help Ranjeet Sonone 2002-08-16 21:24
00839 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help John Cowan 2002-08-16 21:30
00895 Announcement: New W3C specifications of XQuery and XPath2 Massimo Marchiori 2002-08-16 21:47
00887 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Don Park 2002-08-16 23:05
00885 Re: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs Paul Prescod 2002-08-16 23:52
00896 Re: [xml-dev] P2P and URIs Rich Salz 2002-08-17 00:23
00838 Announcement: new Grammar Test Pages for XQuery1.0 and XPath2.0 Massimo Marchiori 2002-08-17 01:07
00832 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 02:20
00840 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Matt Gushee 2002-08-17 02:42
00827 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 03:08
00844 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Arjun Ray 2002-08-17 04:13
00825 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-17 09:46
00883 Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Danny Ayers 2002-08-17 11:12
00898 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-17 12:39
00882 Fwd: infoset data model Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-17 12:55
00829 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 13:15
00841 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-17 13:38
00831 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Ian Graham 2002-08-17 13:59
00837 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 14:38
00907 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 14:38
00914 RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 14:39
00871 RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 14:40
00858 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? John Cowan 2002-08-17 15:24
00861 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? John Cowan 2002-08-17 15:29
00868 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? John Cowan 2002-08-17 15:32
00899 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-17 15:54
00905 URI types and functionality (Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs?) Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-17 16:36
00920 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XQuery subset (was RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-17 17:39
00902 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 17:56
00860 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 17:58
00869 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 18:01
00915 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ann Navarro 2002-08-17 18:42
00916 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-17 18:43
00904 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-17 18:53
00908 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 18:54
00913 Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?) Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 19:34
00870 linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-17 19:43
00859 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 John Cowan 2002-08-17 19:55
00874 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ben Trafford 2002-08-17 20:12
00856 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-17 20:29
00900 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 20:34
00881 RE: [xml-dev] Tearing the Hyperlink Problem Apart (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed?) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 21:05
00828 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Didier PH Martin 2002-08-17 21:13
00842 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Arjun Ray 2002-08-17 21:20
00843 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Henrik Motakef 2002-08-17 22:30
00826 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-17 22:58
00884 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Michael Leditschke 2002-08-18 04:16
00897 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Francis Norton 2002-08-18 07:38
00886 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-18 08:58
00894 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-18 12:43
00977 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-18 13:13
00991 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-18 13:26
00948 Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Mike Champion 2002-08-18 13:53
00933 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-18 14:01
00934 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-18 14:08
00947 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-18 14:10
00990 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Paul Prescod 2002-08-18 14:12
00979 Linking solutions Paul Prescod 2002-08-18 14:37
00952 Re: [xml-dev] Linking solutions Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-18 15:16
00964 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-18 15:19
01012 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Bill de hÓra 2002-08-18 16:22
01021 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Mike Champion 2002-08-18 17:03
01022 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-18 17:09
00992 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ann Navarro 2002-08-18 17:13
00975 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ann Navarro 2002-08-18 17:14
01011 XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-18 17:16
00954 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-18 17:35
00950 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-18 17:41
00965 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-18 17:47
00963 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-18 17:52
00967 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-18 19:00
01023 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Paul Prescod 2002-08-18 19:21
01010 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:10
01009 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:12
01024 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:12
00966 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:13
00951 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:15
00962 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-18 21:16
00949 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ann Navarro 2002-08-18 21:33
00953 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-18 23:15
00988 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-19 00:02
00980 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Eddie Robertsson 2002-08-19 00:29
00935 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces,and authority (was Re: John Cowan 2002-08-19 00:44
00946 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) John Cowan 2002-08-19 00:50
00945 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-19 00:56
00936 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days John Cowan 2002-08-19 01:10
00978 RE: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Michael Leditschke 2002-08-19 01:17
00989 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Eddie Robertsson 2002-08-19 01:41
00976 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-19 02:13
00993 XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) [email protected] 2002-08-19 06:26
01018 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-19 06:32
01003 [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2.2 George Cristian Bina 2002-08-19 08:04
00955 Re: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) [email protected] 2002-08-19 10:15
00973 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear [email protected] 2002-08-19 10:24
00972 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-19 10:26
01001 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear CHIUSANO, Joseph 2002-08-19 11:53
00957 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-19 12:03
01019 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema: At Least One of X Elements Must Appear [email protected] 2002-08-19 12:21
01017 Just-In-Time-Trees (JITTs) Patrick Durusau 2002-08-19 12:41
01006 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ann Navarro 2002-08-19 12:41
00930 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 [email protected] 2002-08-19 13:09
00939 RE: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 13:44
00995 RE: [xml-dev] Acronym spaces, namespaces, and authority (was Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym?) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 14:20
00987 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 14:22
00985 RE: [xml-dev] XML, hypertext Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 14:41
00996 CDATA section Yu Ye Zhou 2002-08-19 15:05
00938 Newbie confusion with xml [email protected] 2002-08-19 15:05
00932 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Jim Ancona 2002-08-19 15:31
00940 Re: [xml-dev] Newbie confusion with xml Mike Champion 2002-08-19 15:32
00927 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Jim Ancona 2002-08-19 15:49
00944 patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 15:51
00925 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Jeff Rafter 2002-08-19 16:07
00983 Re: [xml-dev] XML-Schema Help [email protected] 2002-08-19 16:09
00998 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 16:10
00999 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 16:20
00929 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 17:01
00982 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Champion 2002-08-19 17:02
00941 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 17:10
00931 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Ann Navarro 2002-08-19 17:18
01007 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 17:29
00937 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Jeff Rafter 2002-08-19 17:32
01014 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 17:36
00971 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 17:47
00958 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 17:50
00961 Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 18:09
00968 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Paul Prescod 2002-08-19 18:24
01015 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 18:28
01005 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 18:38
01020 Re: [xml-dev] CDATA section Mike Brown 2002-08-19 18:40
01002 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 18:41
00960 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Didier PH Martin 2002-08-19 19:33
00969 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-19 19:37
01016 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 19:56
01004 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 20:09
01008 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 [email protected] 2002-08-19 20:16
01013 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Tim Bray 2002-08-19 20:24
00970 Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-19 20:26
00974 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 John Cowan 2002-08-19 20:36
00959 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Didier PH Martin 2002-08-19 20:38
00956 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 John Cowan 2002-08-19 20:41
01000 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 [email protected] 2002-08-19 20:54
00981 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Tim Bray 2002-08-19 21:00
00928 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 21:04
00942 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Tim Bray 2002-08-19 21:05
00943 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-19 21:06
00984 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-19 21:13
00926 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-19 21:19
00997 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 John Cowan 2002-08-19 21:26
00986 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Norman Walsh 2002-08-19 21:35
00994 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 [email protected] 2002-08-19 21:36
01077 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-19 21:57
01091 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-19 22:12
01033 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 22:27
01048 Re: [xml-dev] Do sheep dream of electric URLs? Marcus Carr 2002-08-19 22:29
01034 Saving XML Docs on web Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-19 22:29
01047 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 22:47
01092 Re: [xml-dev] Saving XML Docs on web Matt Gushee 2002-08-19 22:58
01090 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Paul Prescod 2002-08-19 23:06
01075 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-19 23:06
01079 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-19 23:20
01064 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-19 23:28
01052 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-19 23:33
01112 RE: [xml-dev] Saving XML Docs on web Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-19 23:41
01121 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? Eddie Robertsson 2002-08-20 00:51
01122 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Champion 2002-08-20 01:13
01111 XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser William F. Gilreath 2002-08-20 02:00
01054 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Haarman 2002-08-20 02:55
01063 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-20 03:55
01050 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-20 04:20
01065 RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-20 04:38
01049 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Champion 2002-08-20 04:40
01067 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-20 05:20
01123 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Paul Prescod 2002-08-20 05:20
01110 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Paul Prescod 2002-08-20 05:26
01109 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 08:44
01124 RE: [xml-dev] Newbie confusion with xml Mark Seaborne 2002-08-20 08:53
01066 Re: [xml-dev] WXS acronym? [email protected] 2002-08-20 09:13
01051 Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? [email protected] 2002-08-20 09:26
01062 Re: [xml-dev] Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? [email protected] 2002-08-20 09:42
01053 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-20 10:40
01088 the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 10:44
01080 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-20 11:30
01035 Re: [xml-dev] Is the XLink WG currently chartered or not? John Cowan 2002-08-20 11:40
01046 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: John Cowan 2002-08-20 12:06
01045 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: bryan 2002-08-20 12:14
01036 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 12:20
01078 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-20 12:40
01089 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-20 12:44
01076 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: [email protected] 2002-08-20 12:58
01093 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 13:05
01118 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 13:10
01103 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 13:11
01055 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Daniel Veillard 2002-08-20 13:15
01072 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 13:17
01073 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 13:18
01057 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-20 13:27
01101 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Miles Sabin 2002-08-20 13:29
01030 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-20 13:30
01119 shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 13:32
01106 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 13:35
01117 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-20 13:46
01039 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 13:59
01095 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Paul Prescod 2002-08-20 14:15
01087 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Champion 2002-08-20 14:24
01085 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 14:27
01096 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers John Cowan 2002-08-20 14:31
01038 RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) Mike Champion 2002-08-20 14:52
01032 RE: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Didier PH Martin 2002-08-20 14:54
01040 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: [email protected] 2002-08-20 14:58
01027 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-20 14:59
01044 ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 15:01
01025 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 15:04
01083 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Mike Champion 2002-08-20 15:20
01098 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Paul Prescod 2002-08-20 15:30
01099 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-20 15:39
01082 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: [email protected] 2002-08-20 15:49
01029 Namespace declaration versus attribute [email protected] 2002-08-20 15:57
01031 xml corpus bryan 2002-08-20 15:58
01041 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 15:59
01037 xml corpus - disregard bryan 2002-08-20 16:00
01107 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute Kian-Tat Lim 2002-08-20 16:07
01114 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-20 16:20
01071 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 16:22
01058 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 16:34
01061 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. John Cowan 2002-08-20 16:36
01068 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute [email protected] 2002-08-20 16:47
01115 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 16:50
01105 Re: [xml-dev] XML Tokenizer - a free, simple open-source XML Parser Tim Bray 2002-08-20 16:53
01120 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 16:57
01102 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-08-20 17:02
01060 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Miles Sabin 2002-08-20 17:29
01069 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 17:31
01116 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 17:35
01104 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 17:41
01108 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 17:47
01070 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 18:12
01113 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser Tim Bray 2002-08-20 18:13
01059 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 18:20
01074 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-20 18:21
01081 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-20 18:22
01056 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Tim Bray 2002-08-20 18:23
01100 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 18:24
01028 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 18:32
01042 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 18:35
01043 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 18:37
01084 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-20 18:48
01026 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 18:52
01097 Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) Tim Bray 2002-08-20 19:02
01086 Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Mike Champion 2002-08-20 19:04
01094 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d John Cowan 2002-08-20 19:05
01177 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 19:10
01191 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-20 19:21
01133 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-20 19:29
01148 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 19:32
01134 Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Tim Bray 2002-08-20 19:42
01147 Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 19:48
01192 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Keith W. Boone 2002-08-20 19:53
01175 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 19:53
01190 Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 19:56
01179 Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Jon Noring 2002-08-20 19:57
01164 filemaker pro, xml and rtf documents David Nyberg, M.D. 2002-08-20 20:10
01152 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 20:14
01221 Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Arjun Ray 2002-08-20 20:50
01212 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-20 20:53
01211 RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 an d the death) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 21:07
01222 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-20 21:09
01154 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 21:21
01163 Re: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Paul Prescod 2002-08-20 21:33
01150 RE: [xml-dev] Shortcomings of Predicate Logic? (was RE: [xml-dev ] RDF Interpretation of XML documents ) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 21:47
01165 namespace reprise Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 21:50
01149 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-20 22:09
01167 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-20 22:14
01223 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-20 22:15
01210 Re: [xml-dev] shared costs (was something about infoset has two daddies) Erik Wilde 2002-08-20 22:37
01209 Searching a SinglNode Karl Stubsjoen 2002-08-20 22:42
01224 A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Margarita Isayeva 2002-08-20 22:47
01166 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM bob mcwhirter 2002-08-20 22:49
01151 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Miles Sabin 2002-08-20 22:54
01188 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-20 23:06
01162 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Mike Champion 2002-08-20 23:15
01153 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-20 23:24
01180 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 00:23
01135 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Mike Champion 2002-08-21 00:37
01146 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 00:47
01145 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Sam Hunting 2002-08-21 00:53
01136 XSD <any> and namespaces Daniel Prager 2002-08-21 00:57
01178 Re: RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Mike Champion 2002-08-21 00:58
01189 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 00:58
01176 RE: [xml-dev] XSD <any> and namespaces Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 01:01
01193 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 01:18
01218 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 01:22
01203 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-21 02:04
01155 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-21 02:15
01173 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Amelia A Lewis 2002-08-21 02:27
01172 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 02:44
01157 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 03:09
01201 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 03:12
01219 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-21 06:20
01206 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Arjun Ray 2002-08-21 07:26
01217 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Erik Wilde 2002-08-21 07:40
01130 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 08:12
01139 ERPANET workshop Urbino [email protected] 2002-08-21 08:20
01195 RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration versus attribute Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 08:57
01187 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Robin Berjon 2002-08-21 09:09
01185 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 09:35
01196 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 09:39
01138 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 09:45
01132 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-21 09:59
01140 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-21 10:23
01127 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 11:31
01144 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) John Cowan 2002-08-21 11:43
01125 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 11:54
01183 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 11:55
01198 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-21 12:16
01199 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-21 12:28
01182 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 12:34
01129 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 12:52
01141 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 12:59
01137 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 13:11
01131 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 13:13
01207 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-21 13:18
01158 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 13:18
01214 RE: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-21 13:19
01171 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 13:20
01215 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 13:25
01161 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Ann Navarro 2002-08-21 13:25
01168 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n ature of DOM Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 13:28
01205 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Ann Navarro 2002-08-21 13:30
01220 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n ature of DOM Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 13:31
01202 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 13:32
01216 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 13:42
01169 global markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0, death of XLink) Simon St.Laurent 2002-08-21 13:47
01160 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-21 13:48
01208 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 13:53
01213 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 13:54
01204 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise james anderson 2002-08-21 14:01
01156 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 14:04
01159 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Julian Reschke 2002-08-21 14:06
01174 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 14:06
01181 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 14:07
01142 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-21 14:09
01200 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Bill de hÓra 2002-08-21 14:10
01126 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Matt Gushee 2002-08-21 14:13
01128 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Eric van der Vlist 2002-08-21 14:14
01170 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise james anderson 2002-08-21 14:14
01143 RE: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-21 14:17
01184 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 14:20
01197 Re: [xml-dev] namespace reprise Miles Sabin 2002-08-21 14:22
01186 RE: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-21 14:28
01194 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20) Lars Marius Garshol 2002-08-21 14:37
01265 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Sean McGrath 2002-08-22 11:25
01277 RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check Steven Livingstone 2002-08-22 18:56
01291 Re: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check Jeni Tennison 2002-08-22 18:56
01248 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature Paul Prescod 2002-08-22 19:06
01233 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM) Ken Sall 2002-08-22 19:28
01234 RE: [xml-dev] Schema Sanity Check Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-22 19:44
01247 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM W. E. Perry 2002-08-22 20:05
01292 How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-22 21:01
01275 Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) John Cowan 2002-08-22 21:04
01290 Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) Jeff Rafter 2002-08-22 22:24
01264 Hobbsian processes Paul Prescod 2002-08-23 00:42
01279 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Dvir Ben-Aaron 2002-08-23 00:44
01252 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Mike Champion 2002-08-23 01:29
01312 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Paul Prescod 2002-08-23 03:30
01321 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine leon 2002-08-23 03:58
01225 [ANN] XML and Web Services Connections (31 Oct- 2 Nov in Orlando) Ken North 2002-08-23 04:22
01322 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes W. E. Perry 2002-08-23 05:32
01311 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM Christopher R. Maden 2002-08-23 10:02
01254 Newby question Carlos Vicente 2002-08-23 10:36
01263 Re: [xml-dev] Newby question Robin Berjon 2002-08-23 10:40
01250 How to read a DTD file? ajay somani 2002-08-23 12:49
01249 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 13:25
01267 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Didier PH Martin 2002-08-23 14:12
01323 Re: [xml-dev] Newby question Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-23 14:30
01310 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 14:35
01309 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Miles Sabin 2002-08-23 14:40
01324 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 14:45
01266 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Didier PH Martin 2002-08-23 14:47
01251 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Miles Sabin 2002-08-23 14:59
01253 Re: [xml-dev] How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? ) John Cowan 2002-08-23 15:19
01262 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Didier PH Martin 2002-08-23 15:21
01288 RE: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Didier PH Martin 2002-08-23 15:28
01280 Re: [xml-dev] Hobbsian processes Mike Champion 2002-08-23 15:35
01235 xmlsoftware.com is back James Tauber 2002-08-23 17:03
01246 Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Tim Bray 2002-08-23 18:04
01245 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 18:10
01236 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-23 18:15
01278 [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-23 18:32
01276 XML schema/DTD for Yellow Pages Andi S. Giri 2002-08-23 18:38
01289 Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Mike Champion 2002-08-23 18:40
01293 RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-23 19:00
01318 Re: RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Mike Champion 2002-08-23 19:12
01303 Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? Roger L. Costello 2002-08-23 19:19
01255 Architectural Forms revival? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-23 19:27
01273 RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 19:30
01257 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Ann Navarro 2002-08-23 19:33
01272 RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 19:33
01301 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-23 19:47
01319 APEX (was Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival?) Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-23 19:48
01317 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-23 19:50
01306 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-23 19:52
01230 Re: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-23 19:59
01239 Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Steve Muench 2002-08-23 20:29
01295 Detection of non-Unicode characters Mark Feblowitz 2002-08-23 20:32
01287 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Ranjeet Sonone 2002-08-23 20:49
01285 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Arjun Ray 2002-08-23 21:01
01296 Re: XML indexing/search engine Farrukh Najmi 2002-08-23 21:21
01238 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Tim Bray 2002-08-23 21:24
01232 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-23 21:29
01240 namespaces and entities: a thought experiment adam souzis 2002-08-23 21:53
01227 Re: [xml-dev] How to read a DTD file? J.Pietschmann 2002-08-23 22:18
01244 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Arjun Ray 2002-08-23 22:19
01283 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Matt Gushee 2002-08-23 22:36
01298 Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Steve Muench 2002-08-23 22:47
01299 Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-24 02:48
01282 Re: [xml-dev] [OT] Java Lexical Analyzer? William F. Gilreath 2002-08-24 03:07
01229 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer? Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-24 04:08
01241 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Can XLink be fixed? Keith W. Boone 2002-08-24 16:26
01231 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters J.Pietschmann 2002-08-24 18:18
01237 Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) Arjun Ray 2002-08-24 22:17
01307 Re: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) Arjun Ray 2002-08-24 23:01
01314 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-25 17:26
01271 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-25 22:45
01258 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM Rich Salz 2002-08-25 22:51
01261 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM Arjun Ray 2002-08-25 23:24
01305 Re: [xml-dev] How to read a DTD file? John Cowan 2002-08-25 23:58
01268 What is this IDs/pattern rot? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-25 23:58
01315 Re: [xml-dev] Infoset chewing gum (was Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 00:08
01320 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM Rich Salz 2002-08-26 00:55
01302 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 01:15
01260 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 01:32
01269 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 01:47
01316 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d ev] patterns vs. identifiers) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 01:53
01304 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 01:55
01308 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 02:14
01313 Re: [xml-dev] RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 02:17
01270 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 02:44
01259 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 02:48
01274 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-26 03:05
01256 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 03:06
01300 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 03:12
01228 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Mike Champion 2002-08-26 03:16
01281 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 03:17
01242 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 03:29
01243 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 03:32
01226 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 03:40
01284 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 03:51
01297 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 06:03
01286 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 06:09
01294 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 06:15
01377 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Uche Ogbuji 2002-08-26 06:21
01391 Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms (was Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2.0 and the death) Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 06:47
01392 Re: [xml-dev] Newby question Carlos Vicente 2002-08-26 13:35
01348 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Ann Navarro 2002-08-26 14:05
01333 RE: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms revival? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-26 14:26
01334 FW: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) Keith W. Boone 2002-08-26 15:40
01347 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-26 16:25
01375 IETF XML principles draft Tim Bray 2002-08-26 18:15
01390 XML parsers acceptance Naren Koka 2002-08-26 18:28
01379 Re: FW: [xml-dev] Renamer-att (was: Can XLink be fixed?) Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 18:33
01364 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers John Cowan 2002-08-26 22:15
01352 RE: [xml-dev] XML parsers acceptance Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-26 22:30
01412 Re: [xml-dev] Reality check needed .... Arjun Ray 2002-08-26 23:05
01421 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Arjun Ray 2002-08-27 04:47
01422 test post - please ignore John Evdemon 2002-08-27 05:19
01411 OT svg display in IE question, performance bryan 2002-08-27 07:10
01354 IBM Spam? [email protected] 2002-08-27 07:21
01363 Re: [xml-dev] Detection of non-Unicode characters Rick Jelliffe 2002-08-27 08:41
01350 How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema? H.-Gerd Rosarius 2002-08-27 09:30
01365 Re: [xml-dev] How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XML Schema? Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-27 12:34
01349 RE: [xml-dev] IBM Spam? W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P. 2002-08-27 12:38
01367 Re: Re: [xml-dev] How to implement getElementById() with Xerces using XMLSchema? H.-Gerd Rosarius 2002-08-27 13:33
01423 Re: [xml-dev] IBM Spam? [email protected] 2002-08-27 14:52
01410 Another Newby question Carlos Vicente 2002-08-27 15:17
01409 Absolute and relative names John Cowan 2002-08-27 15:58
01424 Re: [xml-dev] patterns vs. identifiers Paul Prescod 2002-08-27 18:03
01366 ASP XML help? [email protected] 2002-08-27 18:07
01351 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-27 21:28
01362 Getting dropped off the mail list Jeff Lowery 2002-08-27 21:39
01353 Re: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list Jeff Rafter 2002-08-27 21:55
01388 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-27 21:59
01380 RE: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list Jeff Lowery 2002-08-27 22:23
01335 Re: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-28 01:35
01346 RE: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Jelks Cabaniss 2002-08-28 05:26
01345 Alternate for a SHOWMODALDIALOG Raghava Krishna (CTC) 2002-08-28 06:36
01336 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-28 06:46
01378 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Alaric B. Snell 2002-08-28 08:14
01389 FW: Cover Pages Newsletter August 27, 2002 Karl F. Best 2002-08-28 13:38
01376 problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser Daben Liu 2002-08-28 15:35
01393 Re: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser Thomas B. Passin 2002-08-28 16:08
01418 RE: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser Daben Liu 2002-08-28 16:24
01403 Re: [xml-dev] problem adding new encoding to perl XML::Parser Robin Berjon 2002-08-28 16:29
01355 Re: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureofDOM Paul Prescod 2002-08-28 17:22
01373 RE: [xml-dev] Getting dropped off the mail list Jeff Lowery 2002-08-28 17:40
01372 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-28 23:37
01357 RE: [xml-dev] W3C XML Schema public home page updated: new tools Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-29 00:33
01401 Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20 Arjun Ray 2002-08-29 02:33
01419 Linking global context Didier PH Martin 2002-08-29 13:03
01406 RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 14:57
01417 Re: [xml-dev] Linking global context John Cowan 2002-08-29 15:15
01330 RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 15:30
01339 Re: [xml-dev] Linking global context John Cowan 2002-08-29 15:48
01395 RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 16:17
01387 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-29 16:23
01385 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] John Cowan 2002-08-29 16:24
01396 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-29 16:29
01338 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Jeff Lowery 2002-08-29 16:37
01332 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-29 16:38
01340 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-29 16:59
01327 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] John Cowan 2002-08-29 17:23
01344 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-29 17:30
01325 RE: [xml-dev] A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n ature of DOM Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 17:31
01383 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 17:34
01398 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-29 17:45
01399 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Tim Bray 2002-08-29 17:48
01382 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 18:06
01329 RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context Didier PH Martin 2002-08-29 18:13
01341 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Paul Prescod 2002-08-29 18:15
01331 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Paul Prescod 2002-08-29 18:19
01337 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Mike Champion 2002-08-29 18:21
01407 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] John Cowan 2002-08-29 18:30
01414 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: John Cowan 2002-08-29 18:32
01371 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 18:44
01358 Used the Amazon XML toolkit? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-29 20:06
01361 RE: [xml-dev] Linking global context Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-08-29 21:15
01368 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-29 21:27
01415 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Aaron Skonnard 2002-08-29 21:49
01405 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Paul Prescod 2002-08-29 22:58
01420 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] David Carlisle 2002-08-29 23:21
01402 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Paul Prescod 2002-08-29 23:23
01360 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Joe English 2002-08-29 23:56
01369 Why is there no schema for RSS? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 00:00
01416 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-30 00:27
01404 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) 2002-08-30 00:39
01408 Re: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? Joe English 2002-08-30 02:39
01413 RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 02:50
01370 Re: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Arjun Ray 2002-08-30 07:46
01359 RE: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Naren Chawla 2002-08-30 08:17
01374 RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? Leigh Dodds 2002-08-30 08:31
01356 conversion of XML to DBF [email protected] 2002-08-30 10:18
01400 Re: [xml-dev] XML indexing/search engine Steve Muench 2002-08-30 11:35
01381 [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released Bruno Dumon 2002-08-30 11:38
01328 XLink and XForms [email protected] 2002-08-30 14:03
01342 XLink WG new charter [email protected] 2002-08-30 14:08
01343 RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 14:35
01326 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms David Carlisle 2002-08-30 14:42
01384 ADMINISTRIVIA: Wondering if I can post ... Mike Champion 2002-08-30 14:42
01397 RE: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 14:47
01386 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms [email protected] 2002-08-30 15:18
01394 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Erik Wilde 2002-08-30 16:23
01464 Re: [xml-dev] XLink WG new charter John Cowan 2002-08-30 16:27
01455 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms J.Pietschmann 2002-08-30 16:29
01436 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-08-30 17:27
01426 Re: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? Paul Prescod 2002-08-30 18:09
01427 First TAG WD published Tim Bray 2002-08-30 18:20
01435 xml schema Maciejewski, Thomas 2002-08-30 18:31
01465 what parsers support xml schema Maciejewski, Thomas 2002-08-30 18:33
01453 RE: [xml-dev] the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xml-dev] linking, 80/20] Wayne Steele 2002-08-30 18:36
01463 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 18:37
01457 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Maciejewski, Thomas 2002-08-30 18:37
01447 Re: [xml-dev] xml schema Tim Bray 2002-08-30 18:39
01440 inheritance by restriction Maciejewski, Thomas 2002-08-30 18:41
01475 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 18:42
01442 Re: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Matt Gushee 2002-08-30 18:46
01479 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Maciejewski, Thomas 2002-08-30 18:47
01480 RE: [xml-dev] inheritance by restriction Phil Fuhlman 2002-08-30 18:49
01474 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 18:51
01446 RE: [xml-dev] inheritance by restriction Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 19:00
01448 Re: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Murali Mani 2002-08-30 19:08
01438 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms J.Pietschmann 2002-08-30 19:08
01437 Is W3C Losing the Plot? [email protected] 2002-08-30 19:11
01450 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 19:19
01481 Byzantine schism Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 19:40
01473 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism [email protected] 2002-08-30 19:47
01472 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Murali Mani 2002-08-30 19:57
01482 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Paul Brown 2002-08-30 19:59
01449 Re: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? Paul Prescod 2002-08-30 20:02
01439 RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 20:30
01445 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism [email protected] 2002-08-30 20:31
01441 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism [email protected] 2002-08-30 20:39
01461 RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 20:41
01458 RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 20:57
01428 RE: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Didier PH Martin 2002-08-30 21:00
01434 RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-30 21:04
01433 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism J.Pietschmann 2002-08-30 21:16
01429 RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? Klotz, Leigh 2002-08-30 21:34
01456 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 21:37
01462 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Murali Mani 2002-08-30 21:49
01454 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 22:03
01466 Microsoft XML Diff and Patch 1.0 available Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 23:19
01477 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Murali Mani 2002-08-30 23:24
01470 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-08-30 23:39
01443 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism John Cowan 2002-08-30 23:44
01452 RE: [xml-dev] what parsers support xml schema Murali Mani 2002-08-30 23:50
01451 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Arjun Ray 2002-08-30 23:54
01444 RE: [xml-dev] Is W3C Losing the Plot? Mike Champion 2002-08-31 00:45
01469 RE: [xml-dev] Why is there no schema for RSS? Peter Drayton 2002-08-31 00:46
01478 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Arjun Ray 2002-08-31 05:16
01471 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Arjun Ray 2002-08-31 05:22
01476 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Arjun Ray 2002-08-31 05:38
01425 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Jeni Tennison 2002-08-31 08:20
01431 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Erik Wilde 2002-08-31 14:21
01467 Simple easy to use Java XML parser and data type Ricardo Zuasti 2002-08-31 15:52
01460 Re: [xml-dev] XLink and XForms Arjun Ray 2002-08-31 18:34
01459 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Erik Wilde 2002-08-31 20:52
01468 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Tim Bray 2002-08-31 22:19
01430 Re: [xml-dev] Byzantine schism Arjun Ray 2002-08-31 22:30
01432 RE: [xml-dev] xml schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-09-01 03:36